From: Yuri Vasilevski <yvasilev@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL-2 vs GPL-2+
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:53:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061222155325.0f97c017@dukebook.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612222156.55163@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@gentoo.org> wrote:
> At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU General
> Public License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be sure it's
> alright to license it to "any later version". Linux kernel for
> instance is licensed _only_ under GPLv2, but not any later version.
I don't think this is a good solution, as in any case the package is
licensed under GPL-2, so how about for the packages that only support
GPL-2 we set:
LICENSE="GPL-2"
While for the ones that support v2 or later (this is actually a special
case of multiple licensing) we do:
LICENSE="GPL-2 GPL-3"
when it becomes available?
Best,
Yuri.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-22 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-22 20:56 [gentoo-dev] GPL-2 vs GPL-2+ Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-12-22 21:53 ` Yuri Vasilevski [this message]
2006-12-22 22:06 ` Alec Warner
2006-12-22 22:15 ` Yuri Vasilevski
2006-12-22 22:31 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-12-22 22:43 ` Alec Warner
2006-12-22 23:11 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-12-23 8:40 ` Harald van Dijk
2006-12-22 23:17 ` Yuri Vasilevski
2006-12-23 9:27 ` expose
2007-01-03 9:18 ` Paul de Vrieze
2007-01-03 21:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-01-04 9:17 ` Paul de Vrieze
2007-01-06 17:52 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-01-06 17:55 ` Steve Long
2007-01-04 10:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kevin F. Quinn
2007-01-04 11:00 ` Paul de Vrieze
2007-01-04 13:10 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2007-01-04 17:34 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-12-22 23:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2006-12-24 18:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stephen Bennett
2007-01-04 0:19 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2007-01-28 0:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061222155325.0f97c017@dukebook.lan \
--to=yvasilev@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox