From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GwRNn-00071a-7G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:54:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBIMrw0l029237; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:53:58 GMT Received: from duke.math.cinvestav.mx (Duke.math.cinvestav.mx [148.247.186.97]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBIMq0SJ014164 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:52:01 GMT Received: from dukebook.lan (unknown [189.140.153.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by duke.math.cinvestav.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C43A1013A for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:51:59 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:52:45 -0600 From: Yuri Vasilevski To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Message-ID: <20061218165245.537fce6f@dukebook.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061218212822.GI15247@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> References: <20061218072038.GC15247@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <1166454120.11642.15.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20061218093359.6e254853@dune.math.cinvestav.mx> <4586C3F6.2050104@gentoo.org> <20061218145356.588eb055@dukebook.lan> <20061218212822.GI15247@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5424b8ca-dd45-44df-97c7-629b5b402bcb X-Archives-Hash: 30d6e9c2a1d9a12ebf700f5ea9137f3b On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:28:22 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:53:56PM -0600, Yuri Vasilevski wrote: > > This will make the script a little bit slower, but it should not be > > that hard to integrate. > Please read the message that I sent as well. In specific, there is NO > way we can gaurentee that the machine has an up to date copy of the > tree > - thus why we use CVS history directly. Yes, sorry, my mistake. For some reason I assumed that on the CVS server you also have the tree ready to use and in an unpacked form. Yuri. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list