Stephen Bennett wrote: > > Could you spell out that exception clause, please? > > It doesn't translate well into words, but we'll go with something > like "Unless you know exactly why the rule is there, understand > fully the implications of breaking it, and know why it's a > good idea in this particular case." > > However, if you're in a position to be invoking that clause, you > should know about it anyway. Can we skip the sekrit rulez crap and just spell it out? Really, how does this help anyone?