From: Wolfram Schlich <lists@wolfram.schlich.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openssh sftplogging patch
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:15:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061113121546.ALLYOURBASEAREBELONGTOUS.D27375@bla.fasel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061113092654.bd7c5c43.rumi_ml@rtfm.hu>
* Rumi Szabolcs <rumi_ml@rtfm.hu> [2006-11-13 09:15]:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:11:09 -0500
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 12 November 2006 11:38, Rumi Szabolcs wrote:
> > > Could anybody please tell what happened?
> >
> > it's been integrated upstream so there's no point in having a patch anymore
> > -mike
>
> Shouldn't this be mentioned in the ChangeLog somewhere?
In what ChangeLog, the portage package ChangeLog?
Yeah, I also had to look at the OpenSSH ChangeLog to find out that
SFTP logging has been added as a new feature.
> This is the 4.4p1 ebuild we are talking about and I could not find
> too much of a difference between the patches against 4.3 and 4.4:
>
> http://sftplogging.sourceforge.net/download/v1.5/openssh-4.4p1.sftplogging-v1.5.patch
>
> To me this doesn't look like as if it would have been integrated...
The sftp-server(8) binary has new command line options that influence
SFTP logging:
-f log_facility
-l log_level
The sftplogging also contains functionality to control umask and permit
chmod and chgrp, which the upstream sftp-server does not provide.
--
Wolfram Schlich
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-13 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-12 16:38 [gentoo-dev] openssh sftplogging patch Rumi Szabolcs
2006-11-13 4:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-11-13 8:26 ` Rumi Szabolcs
2006-11-13 12:15 ` Wolfram Schlich [this message]
2006-11-14 6:40 ` Rumi Szabolcs
2006-11-14 8:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-05-03 10:23 ` Rumi Szabolcs
2006-11-15 0:01 ` Wolfram Schlich
[not found] <bug-178302-11180@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
[not found] ` <comment-1179094595-bug-178302-11180@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
2007-05-14 6:17 ` Rumi Szabolcs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061113121546.ALLYOURBASEAREBELONGTOUS.D27375@bla.fasel.org \
--to=lists@wolfram.schlich.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox