From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ghv5S-0001XM-Pf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:35:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8LYQkK016761; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:34:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8LV2QU012086 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:31:03 GMT Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (unknown [151.56.126.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D38F645BC; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:31:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:30:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611082114.27008@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <4552494D.6040206@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4552494D.6040206@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4207124.JmnuRjMQ9R"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611082230.57956@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Archives-Salt: e501f8db-f63d-4404-8e7f-41cbd65ba4eb X-Archives-Hash: 50cd24957df931a8b025887aa1cd0724 --nextPart4207124.JmnuRjMQ9R Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 08 November 2006 22:17, Alin Nastac wrote: > It doesn't matter what From, Sender or whatever else in the message heade= r. > The part that counts is the Return-Path (the "mail from:" part of the > SMTP protocol). Sender or Returh-Path, whatever.. > Of course, MUAs such as Thunderbird don't give you the possibility to > set that and it will be the same as your From address. Shouldn't be your provider's mail server to set it? Both of my SSL-enabled= =20 mail servers, that are authenticated (GMail and the Italian postal service)= =20 set this correctly, thus I don't have the SPF_NEUTRAL error on them. If you "forge" the Return-Path, by simply not providing any protection abou= t=20 its value on the mailserver, nor on the client, then I'd say that the=20 SpamAssassin behaviour is perfectly fine. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... --nextPart4207124.JmnuRjMQ9R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFUkyRe2h1+2mHVWMRAhl+AJ4r3X/8wrWgArBxRJ/+Zl2C6MRoowCgi9ho pEafJd5ujqZrxzanv4f7ObE= =1pk6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4207124.JmnuRjMQ9R-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list