From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18763-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1Ghv5S-0001XM-Pf
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:35:59 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8LYQkK016761;
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:34:26 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8LV2QU012086
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:31:03 GMT
Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (unknown [151.56.126.161])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D38F645BC;
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:31:02 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:30:57 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611082114.27008@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <4552494D.6040206@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4552494D.6040206@gentoo.org>
X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z<D)?o\/2TO|,=?utf-8?q?j=5EzC=3AoDSA=24++z3eixq-H=5E=0A=09+g?=<5?pNbV&a1{sZc=}l\wjrMam[JwcgZ%q{M%k~zJ!;#BCjK.n9y`>?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart4207124.JmnuRjMQ9R";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200611082230.57956@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
X-Archives-Salt: e501f8db-f63d-4404-8e7f-41cbd65ba4eb
X-Archives-Hash: 50cd24957df931a8b025887aa1cd0724
--nextPart4207124.JmnuRjMQ9R
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 22:17, Alin Nastac wrote:
> It doesn't matter what From, Sender or whatever else in the message heade=
r.
> The part that counts is the Return-Path (the "mail from:" part of the
> SMTP protocol).
Sender or Returh-Path, whatever..
> Of course, MUAs such as Thunderbird don't give you the possibility to
> set that and it will be the same as your From address.
Shouldn't be your provider's mail server to set it? Both of my SSL-enabled=
=20
mail servers, that are authenticated (GMail and the Italian postal service)=
=20
set this correctly, thus I don't have the SPF_NEUTRAL error on them.
If you "forge" the Return-Path, by simply not providing any protection abou=
t=20
its value on the mailserver, nor on the client, then I'd say that the=20
SpamAssassin behaviour is perfectly fine.
=2D-=20
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ...
--nextPart4207124.JmnuRjMQ9R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBFUkyRe2h1+2mHVWMRAhl+AJ4r3X/8wrWgArBxRJ/+Zl2C6MRoowCgi9ho
pEafJd5ujqZrxzanv4f7ObE=
=1pk6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart4207124.JmnuRjMQ9R--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list