From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18760-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1Ghtss-0003W4-0F
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:18:54 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8KHq1o031315;
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:17:52 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8KEVEA029027
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:14:31 GMT
Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (unknown [151.56.126.161])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BC9645AE;
Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:14:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:14:22 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <20061108175413.7a76fd3c@snowdrop.home> <20061108200152.GA4007@mail.lieber.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061108200152.GA4007@mail.lieber.org>
X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z<D)?o\/2TO|,=?utf-8?q?j=5EzC=3AoDSA=24++z3eixq-H=5E=0A=09+g?=<5?pNbV&a1{sZc=}l\wjrMam[JwcgZ%q{M%k~zJ!;#BCjK.n9y`>?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart5852796.rstj6OOguV";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200611082114.27008@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 9ee1c759-22e7-4575-80f4-94ce89028d4c
X-Archives-Hash: a988a6d49e51216e95f0bb6e8afd3d65
--nextPart5852796.rstj6OOguV
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 21:01, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> So, in other words, spammers aren't abusing anything related to SPF.
> They're sending mail using forged return-paths and SPF is highlighting
> that. =C2=A0Which is exactly what SPF is designed to do.
I'm no mail expert, but I want something clarified because this whole thing=
=20
might as well be a non issue if it's as I understood it.
If I were to send my gentoo mail through a mail.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org, wi=
th=20
its own SPF record, (I'm not as this is not a "real" domain I have access t=
o,=20
nor a mailserver for what it's worth), with a From: flameeyes@gentoo.org an=
d=20
a Sender: flameeyes@flameeyes.is-a-geek.org, would it be a PASS or a FAIL i=
n=20
SPF?
=2D-=20
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ...
--nextPart5852796.rstj6OOguV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBFUjqie2h1+2mHVWMRAsKxAKDbBpfDrRmk+Vev6JN0a3TXBoog4ACfV84p
pGRrDOJpwHr0TzWfXXAHbhk=
=JMMT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart5852796.rstj6OOguV--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list