From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ghtss-0003W4-0F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:18:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8KHq1o031315; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:17:52 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8KEVEA029027 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:14:31 GMT Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org (unknown [151.56.126.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BC9645AE; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:14:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:14:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <20061108175413.7a76fd3c@snowdrop.home> <20061108200152.GA4007@mail.lieber.org> In-Reply-To: <20061108200152.GA4007@mail.lieber.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5852796.rstj6OOguV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611082114.27008@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9ee1c759-22e7-4575-80f4-94ce89028d4c X-Archives-Hash: a988a6d49e51216e95f0bb6e8afd3d65 --nextPart5852796.rstj6OOguV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 08 November 2006 21:01, Kurt Lieber wrote: > So, in other words, spammers aren't abusing anything related to SPF. > They're sending mail using forged return-paths and SPF is highlighting > that. =C2=A0Which is exactly what SPF is designed to do. I'm no mail expert, but I want something clarified because this whole thing= =20 might as well be a non issue if it's as I understood it. If I were to send my gentoo mail through a mail.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org, wi= th=20 its own SPF record, (I'm not as this is not a "real" domain I have access t= o,=20 nor a mailserver for what it's worth), with a From: flameeyes@gentoo.org an= d=20 a Sender: flameeyes@flameeyes.is-a-geek.org, would it be a PASS or a FAIL i= n=20 SPF? =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... --nextPart5852796.rstj6OOguV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFUjqie2h1+2mHVWMRAsKxAKDbBpfDrRmk+Vev6JN0a3TXBoog4ACfV84p pGRrDOJpwHr0TzWfXXAHbhk= =JMMT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5852796.rstj6OOguV-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list