From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18756-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1Ght1L-0006Vw-Pb
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:23:36 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8JLvIJ028903;
	Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:21:57 GMT
Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8JJPSY031529
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:19:25 GMT
Received: from uberpc.marples.name (uberpc.marples.name [10.73.1.30])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152AC1900FE
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  8 Nov 2006 19:19:25 +0000 (GMT)
From: Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:19:30 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <20061108172955.GY4007@mail.lieber.org> <20061108175413.7a76fd3c@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <20061108175413.7a76fd3c@snowdrop.home>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200611081919.30099.uberlord@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: c1391e27-3d7b-403e-ba82-12cb969d201d
X-Archives-Hash: 28abd935e1e3aa403c0ca8c324a16550

On Wednesday 08 November 2006 17:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> SPF makes the classic incorrect
> assumption that spammers won't abuse the system.

Ciaran makes the classic incorrect assumption that people can magically read 
his mind to know how he thinks spammers can abuse the system.

-- 
Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org>
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking)
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list