From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhrTE-0008AL-Or for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:44:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8HgJ49018028; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:42:19 GMT Received: from panther.panther.lieber.org (mail.lieber.org [64.147.188.100]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8HbbBt025943 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:37:38 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panther.panther.lieber.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8AEE84023 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:37:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lieber.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from panther.panther.lieber.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (panther.lieber.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aP7sV1hDpCCB for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by panther.panther.lieber.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3FC9EE84022; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:37:24 +0000 From: Kurt Lieber To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Message-ID: <20061108173724.GZ4007@mail.lieber.org> References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <454DDAC3.4030208@gentoo.org> <1162841820.10506.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <200611062325.19963.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20061108150740.GV4007@mail.lieber.org> <455211B0.5080202@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lzfPtAjrR1KYNfg0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <455211B0.5080202@gentoo.org> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: bc000358-4d96-470f-b339-91ec2e03a75f X-Archives-Hash: 4e052d340352463ae20901a5ef1357d9 --lzfPtAjrR1KYNfg0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:19:44PM +0200 or thereabouts, Alin Nastac wrote: > I say we should have +all (SPF-capable MTAs will consider any IP address > as authorized to send mail on behalf of g.o - equivalent with "Message > source OK"). this interpretation is correct. > He says we should have ?all (when another SPF-capable MTA will check the > my IP address, it will take my message with a grain of salt - equivalent > with "Message source unknown"). this interpretation is not correct. What you are describing is ~all, not ?all. ?all instructs the MTA to make no interpretation at all related to a failure. In other words, do not add or subtract any salt whatsoever.[1] ~all tells the MTA to add some salt.[2] --kurt [1] http://new.openspf.org/RFC_4408#op-result-neutral [2] http://new.openspf.org/RFC_4408#op-result-softfail --lzfPtAjrR1KYNfg0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFUhXUJPpRNiftIEYRAsQ5AJ9+Haik6rqCHXhGakIPDJ1l1UkI6QCfcs90 Y2Mn1Otw5l9VpZciW5si5F8= =5XVy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lzfPtAjrR1KYNfg0-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list