From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18749-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1Ghqua-0001PF-H7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:08:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8H6gdN018084; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:06:42 GMT Received: from panther.panther.lieber.org (mail.lieber.org [64.147.188.100]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8H2WAE022543 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:02:33 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panther.panther.lieber.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816A0E84021 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:02:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lieber.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from panther.panther.lieber.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (panther.lieber.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJAbaurQtmQG for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by panther.panther.lieber.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B80C6E84024; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:02:04 +0000 From: Kurt Lieber <klieber@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Message-ID: <20061108170204.GW4007@mail.lieber.org> References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611061720.50442.vapier@gentoo.org> <20061106223839.GA6332@gentoo.org> <200611061748.34810.vapier@gentoo.org> <1162902277.23009.2.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> <455092FF.4000308@gentoo.org> <1162911839.20782.1.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> <4550C471.8050908@gentoo.org> <20061108152547.GA15325@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GTGEtWEe6jD60dxL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061108152547.GA15325@gentoo.org> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 836cbc6f-c08f-4a24-b072-e0fac0638f9b X-Archives-Hash: e6d2a0cfc36d0b274775cca6b0119040 --GTGEtWEe6jD60dxL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:25:47AM -0500 or thereabouts, Aron Griffis wrote: > Gentoo.org has elected to provide the SPF records, effectively marking > gentoo.org mail originating from other SMTP servers as rogue. =20 That simply is not true. Please read the write-up that I prepared that explains what we are, in fact, saying with our curret SPF record. Please pay special attention to the discussion around ?all. If other people choose to mis-interpret the data, that's their own fault. --kurt --GTGEtWEe6jD60dxL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFUg2MJPpRNiftIEYRAu1IAJ4qTckoBymc8TFHmfPFKH6K708m1ACfZ+nh CLaMswVvom9wNlyFDA70/0Q= =icom -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GTGEtWEe6jD60dxL-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list