From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ghqq2-0002Rd-Gp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:03:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8H2AGL014606; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:02:10 GMT Received: from tiger.gg3.net (s235239.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [220.157.235.239]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8GwMh0007585 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:58:23 GMT Received: (qmail 23223 invoked by uid 89); 8 Nov 2006 16:58:20 -0000 Received: from lion.gg3.net (10.0.0.2) by tiger.gg3.net with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 16:58:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 143955 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Nov 2006 16:58:20 -0000 Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 01:58:20 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Message-ID: <20061108165820.GA143804@lion.gg3.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <454DDAC3.4030208@gentoo.org> <1162841820.10506.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <200611062325.19963.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20061108150740.GV4007@mail.lieber.org> <20061108152317.GF21817@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061108152317.GF21817@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: 98db59e1-c6b4-4d0e-b16b-9186bf5142ec X-Archives-Hash: db44990e792c216abd03bfc979e87047 --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline maillog: 08/11/2006-09:23:17(-0600): Grant Goodyear types > Kurt Lieber wrote: [Wed Nov 08 2006, 09:07:40AM CST] > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:25:19PM +0100 or thereabouts, Danny van Dyk wrote: > > > Kurt: Please write up a short text to explain why you think this is > > > necessary for Gentoo mailservers. Thanks in advance! > > > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~klieber/spf.txt > > Thanks, that's quite helpful. > > What did you do (or not do) to avoid paying the SPF_NEUTRAL SA "penalty" > in your test e-mail sent using gmail? It's the envelope sender's domain that SPF is testing, and the sender is kurt.lieber@gmail.com Not much to do with the SPF record for gentoo.org Guess -- (* Georgi Georgiev (* Why couldn't Helen Heller drive? she was a (* *) chutz@gg3.net *) woman -- gsfgf *) (* http://www.gg3.net/ (* (* --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFUgysfXO2NUT1EmYRAlmdAKDL0ASedLIeEJKxJOLKdEKJq0t+GQCg6+Rv rdF6duEJe2tqVkyC4HOFDws= =waV0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list