From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ghpdn-0003CL-RW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:47:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA8Fk3x5025644; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:46:03 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA8Fh3tW031663 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:43:29 GMT Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 511) id A42AF64B4C; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:25:47 -0500 X-OfflineIMAP-1619244349-64676f73656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1162999559-0963363567103-v4.0.11 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Message-ID: <20061108152547.GA15325@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611061720.50442.vapier@gentoo.org> <20061106223839.GA6332@gentoo.org> <200611061748.34810.vapier@gentoo.org> <1162902277.23009.2.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> <455092FF.4000308@gentoo.org> <1162911839.20782.1.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> <4550C471.8050908@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4550C471.8050908@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: 0f9b242e-dee9-4162-9e6e-b57f3acf4b7a X-Archives-Hash: fa5b0ddd252e89b36156513928c33032 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lance Albertson wrote: [Tue Nov 07 2006, 12:37:53PM EST] > Nothing is stopping you from sending from another smtp server. The > problem people have been complaining about is that spamassassin is > adding a score of 1-2 for anyone who sends from a host other than > what we stated in the SPF rule.=20 Any spam-filtering program should be able to trust the SPF information if a site provides it. Gentoo.org has elected to provide the SPF records, effectively marking gentoo.org mail originating from other SMTP servers as rogue. So it's misleading to tell devs they can send =66rom any SMTP server... > I personally don't remember the reasons for the SPF argument so > I can't speak for that in a reasonable manner. When SPF was added, > I don't believe SA was scoring emails in this way so it wasn't as > much as a deal then. We probably should look into seeing if we can > get around that, It seems a bit ridiculous to broadcast a list of authoritative gentoo.org SMTP servers, then suggest to devs to send from other servers, and try to handle the mismatch on the recipient end. Is that what you're suggesting? Aron --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFUfb6JrHF4yAQTrARAoyBAKCOuU6VolEZEpI3mmY0mMF1xOOIvQCgi2jP WvGnVchRuIsC33rW+rl6n34= =pWVr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list