From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhVcm-0005nC-92 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:24:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA7IMTcT026508; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:22:29 GMT Received: from outmail.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA7IJds4011736 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:19:39 GMT Received: from snowdrop.home (unknown [86.111.164.202]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E67E53108 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:47:32 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:47:28 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Message-ID: <20061107174728.064de822@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <4550B9B4.9060008@gentoo.org> References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611061720.50442.vapier@gentoo.org> <20061106223839.GA6332@gentoo.org> <200611061748.34810.vapier@gentoo.org> <45502DEB.20404@gentoo.org> <20061107160048.GB21817@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <20061107160958.1f1cf26c@snowdrop.home> <4550B9B4.9060008@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.6 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_bAifiG_pn2lZ8ES/=pGQqbk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 22196297-2bdb-42f2-a3b1-ac781c2d98cd X-Archives-Hash: fa9a6ae4872383dc7ebdc562628e1246 --Sig_bAifiG_pn2lZ8ES/=pGQqbk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:52:04 +0200 Alin Nastac wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Kurt didn't back up his views back then. Rather typically, he just | > told Method that he disagreed and that he wasn't going to budge no | > matter what anyone said... | > =20 | In the year 2005, the only gentoo-core discussion related to SPF was | between me and lcars. | Probably you are talking about an IRC conversation. Nope, looks like it was just a bit earlier than 2005. The post you want to read is: From: Joshua Brindle Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:30:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-core] gentoo's policy on sender id (-infras use of spf) Along with the rest of the thread. Notice in particular how Joshua claims that Kurt has never justified using SPF, and how in replies he refuses to do so. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=3D13 --Sig_bAifiG_pn2lZ8ES/=pGQqbk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFUMay96zL6DUtXhERAueEAKCVWXIgCKBAHenL4zsBIL3k2d6qLwCgl9BQ 0RmmnM/WqNWvfqSiwioTsqM= =f/GC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_bAifiG_pn2lZ8ES/=pGQqbk-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list