From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhTbJ-0004Xd-PY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:15:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA7GDfpH023438; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:13:41 GMT Received: from outmail.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA7GA3Le010135 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:10:03 GMT Received: from snowdrop.home (unknown [86.111.164.202]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D9C5550D for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:09:58 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Message-ID: <20061107160958.1f1cf26c@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20061107160048.GB21817@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611061720.50442.vapier@gentoo.org> <20061106223839.GA6332@gentoo.org> <200611061748.34810.vapier@gentoo.org> <45502DEB.20404@gentoo.org> <20061107160048.GB21817@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.6 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_W0+U8eM39T3=BqJ+bm30kL="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 46d79cb5-4553-4502-8784-06fbbb7b758e X-Archives-Hash: 475ca87b9ba36fb04a0b5ddc803fa54e --Sig_W0+U8eM39T3=BqJ+bm30kL= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:00:49 -0600 Grant Goodyear wrote: | With all due respect, I disagree. My recollection was that the SPF | discussion was held well over a year ago, on a list that isn't | archived, so the rationale for using SPF isn't available for many of | the devs who have started raising questions about it. Kurt's reply | to those devs was not particularly helpful. (My suspicion is that | Kurt figures that he's been through all of these arguments before, | and doesn't want to rehash them yet again, but that misses the fact | that many of our current devs not only weren't part of that earlier | discussion, but they have no access to it, either.) Kurt didn't back up his views back then. Rather typically, he just told Method that he disagreed and that he wasn't going to budge no matter what anyone said... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=3D13 --Sig_W0+U8eM39T3=BqJ+bm30kL= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFUK/Y96zL6DUtXhERAnF6AJ4plEgItoqlUjJLd5iLgVFf0vCVSwCg1zWE C2Hv9kDSxbiPms6GTcJJ9QQ= =Cnly -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_W0+U8eM39T3=BqJ+bm30kL=-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list