From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhFbG-00050A-FG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:18:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA71H0l5005236; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 01:17:00 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA71Eorp021725 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 01:14:50 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7E264482 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 01:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31921 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2006 20:11:36 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 6 Nov 2006 20:11:36 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 20:15:18 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611061643.25418.vapier@gentoo.org> <20061107010631.51c6e5cc@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20061107010631.51c6e5cc@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2691790.cEB6JEpQIv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611062015.18899.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 20d8a809-e7b6-47dd-ae23-23244f966f00 X-Archives-Hash: 95120b9e8c9f6fbbfcda842950648f73 --nextPart2691790.cEB6JEpQIv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 06 November 2006 20:06, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:43:24 -0500 Mike Frysinger > | infra believes using SPF helps fight spam > > Then infra are wrong. SPF was not designed to fight spam. original design does not limit future possibilities ... i could make a lot = of=20 pointless blanket statements about what things were originally designed for= =20 thus future use is not possible =2Dmike --nextPart2691790.cEB6JEpQIv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARU/eJkFjO5/oN/WBAQJonA/+P1Cs5TY5s3/QAUgOjCX/VLlWg6jbENoe yZuFUa5FSs00ofBdFskqgOIDgVHqm9XVDQCXjGlXCeBuVfPYva+YcRzssDsEJHXh dGNYzbeC9OPtkBTMIf6pZJCnqP98DtzsZUBFGzb8nqMcspe3DmmA9I+EcAWR6MY3 C3msIHhg07i6a6sGoaIccLfhJy0/We+R6tK80m6l6x7ep1LB83bQ2ogfH8iltvGa kWVFoQCDE4EmH+h1W7RkRYDGje8QEfs+tyHHAbzyr85+Vwa0EqIuoKjtn3HDOljP 2vvYdQ5Xl6qCMJ0mH138WkIdM0qjirpYKJVFNG9zQUuWoh73h1GZYHceRYc4wqVs m/5QWyZLCcuBmbsl8FjoUipZB7g+3EnRvq3t+XIVcPIyFpD1Y4baOwxkrIdFKjZQ dmtJ545Da1mtyQL1vhqox1NvPVnjH0p1ICpihEYBOa3SKpPQ0uN1iGMKH5F5QR/j 7RvGL6SYYPgawsgagC8yP5jqljgEO5/3e9q1Gn/bUtiE0LICgqhR9xYLzFkQ6BZl 4rogMTVzr/T4PGuzF39ZwJgO3Qn6Rhk83TkiTvsmq3US7V6nwwyXGHWBRt+kLA/G DHN78cv/gF7eMifPixAMa3QolczdnH1uTpyZRlRXVe6TdRLdQ4uexV5LE+L5NKpx GK6X4Q9166Q= =AfDi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2691790.cEB6JEpQIv-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list