From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18634-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GhAcL-000885-MW
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:58:50 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA6JuXcF019929;
	Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:56:33 GMT
Received: from outmail.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA6JsFiK008421
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:54:15 GMT
Received: from snowdrop.home (unknown [86.111.164.202])
	by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39DD505A6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Nov 2006 19:54:15 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:54:10 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November
Message-ID: <20061106195410.7157ddbf@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <1162841820.10506.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org>
	<200611050530.43128.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<454DBF5F.50408@gentoo.org>
	<200611050545.09640.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<454DC709.2000905@gentoo.org>
	<454DDAC3.4030208@gentoo.org>
	<1162841820.10506.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.6 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_=Rkdrs_0iG91eatWG14FKsb";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: 14c95c69-1be6-4b79-9e50-b8b80e008bf9
X-Archives-Hash: 4d37558c66a0f93c69f3597183091669

--Sig_=Rkdrs_0iG91eatWG14FKsb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:37:00 -0500 Chris Gianelloni
<wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
| So because you didn't like the answer from the people responsible for
| this, you'd rather go over their heads and try to bring this up to the
| council, so we can override their decisions?  Not bloody likely.

Isn't that part of why the Council is there? To make decisions on things
where some people consider that those normally in charge of something
are doing it incorrectly and refusing to fix things?

Not saying that either side is right here... But there're a lot of
objections to SPF out there, several people complaining and no
justification from infra beyond "we're using it anyway".

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail                : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web                 : http://ciaranm.org/
as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=3D13


--Sig_=Rkdrs_0iG91eatWG14FKsb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFT5Lk96zL6DUtXhERAnuPAJ9S50VaUTkOPfdgIl54FBJ9HgcvqACeIECB
Q4sK8Yu4eFGocNyVNCm+I0U=
=qEYe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_=Rkdrs_0iG91eatWG14FKsb--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list