From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GgfZL-0006UH-Uj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 10:49:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA5AmLPm009487; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:48:21 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA5AinQa023720 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:44:50 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7B264821 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22013 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2006 05:42:06 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2006 05:42:06 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 05:45:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611050530.43128.vapier@gentoo.org> <454DBF5F.50408@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <454DBF5F.50408@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1227196.DWMufdeBeE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611050545.09640.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2bd8bc31-014b-4866-9c57-4cd87ee16911 X-Archives-Hash: 2796f50e8ec000113093ad9a6bb33ec2 --nextPart1227196.DWMufdeBeE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ? > > It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had > to be involved in this decision. it isnt ... so file a bug for infra -mike --nextPart1227196.DWMufdeBeE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARU3AtUFjO5/oN/WBAQIj1Q/+KMGDl/aPOM0lnO0iisuX2q6M7kh9MQF0 gLeLitghCITOY5m15eZkBf2yqafWUU2wKsTEMb0vYEbifAwMevRx9lNv/N0QLKS4 53dLOMZYTgvF0WpNXaBacTmDcehoj9ymLXeuJVGKJinB7MgQcoEBeL68JB8HtGom sdCe83rfnt2TbXWcoeZ1N0Ht6dJdcya0WLG3Cnc/rJdJZ2qBTf3I2SHw6JQ163V4 vzLpdvj4JNtoVvL8F7xjPHeDhYvhraiBJKC0kI5T+9TpqorURGuuB7pSAV4z7MyR AviQrkYoAI7OLRIzUolUT0HD1nK73XCzeCj9rUh+A/nYTwgsq2m0t5UvUow4V1XB HNpzZJfDMWqyAFsyJeEuyFmE2CTF/I0sbxS8svjegJcn0NuDmxGpjSJkwNTStgcC V8nVBIHOMMR9I5stZv+G6/+ItDe4GB2Mf2KJ4h3izVK0mi7RQvDvjjmwdHUEjW9Y bs34Ko9f8GKsWPqZ/Fo9huv2C1MjYvalNRCRH6cp86uGf1yGZG/hu6dCjmjIkf4W E/YCJBHgE8I7aUUYnew2cnB93s3f/tTq8feyyPZtM175ZW46jH58KnvE3Qb08Wwf Mrf/5iCL1TXr6x/xsslxR0fNkajrCkKibDmjS03qQArXsPmbZjG1oqOo4DUoYedH OV7masPlNrw= =v50q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1227196.DWMufdeBeE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list