From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ggen4-0004tI-2Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 09:59:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA59wrUs024589; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:58:53 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA59ut61008093 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:56:55 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A9F649F3 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31752 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2006 04:54:12 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2006 04:54:12 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 04:57:13 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <1162719343.14498.35.camel@tuxhugger> In-Reply-To: <1162719343.14498.35.camel@tuxhugger> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1672485.DI0ksurL32"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611050457.14639.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 27366756-0f7e-4cbe-9787-e7b465ebc5a0 X-Archives-Hash: 550ee28d7a641f30f4515fde76704a5b --nextPart1672485.DI0ksurL32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 05 November 2006 04:35, Peter Gordon wrote: > I have one item that I would like to see addressed in the next possible > council meeting: The reply behavior of gentoo-core messages. What's > happening is that gentoo-core appears to have no default Reply-To header > set. i dont see anyone talking to infra about it so why dont you start there -mike --nextPart1672485.DI0ksurL32 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARU21ekFjO5/oN/WBAQI8IBAAn9qmSdKjkT+VwpQm243M7g6i0QTRPmY6 1ilNk+hKKuF15Ukq7wFJ63S8n5BUjbdz4VuITXT13S/IBg94i8oMVzJKqxlFzK+N nZwFkgBJ7FLMgSsOv2UEnL7IQsBlTlq5ZpOHr+gPRXchYliCVxdgXUC9pS2aiqFt Am1sejbzTZk6Et1LoDwJ5qOOFOGWXjExCr0p+jJCAJ7a2fpW2ttWRuT7KjEaX3vw oauJSvC2Kv9Z9Gb5+P3XbOc2G+tmZWT8QSctt2VL+OIYCh+U6qQJQXgJQ+QWHgv1 1wn5z1SZ7GTNxari83jrAEPGCTv1h/BE2Jh5EQzvkC1ESLPJ5r97ssbtv5II0D+d FNkaOTneQpCXGD7JqWnCnPVKuMyvkQSzTagsCcqu/tthztH2wnd4P2cBdMdN5JC/ e3xSj2hCNbdkRDVN7DD8wik6B8hylyKo/s2ZR2PLQa02EVjF08YWTScGkGIFZGST CuHrVtjSOB+uEFBWtMy6/ZVwV0MmpCY+arlM6l9TvlqGm4CUs9h4vmsICGMdlq0R hCi5ENZMg61Ea6HVQfuPKhlVinrICuCyCGwO+hIS5PWvqKDyzAFM+5SavPcv7dy1 CEhPM4JLC11XLZ9/z3ULkHAiWx9xoG4tLy58+hDNwuATC5vV7uqg1JBMIOSwkokE hBfgeWoVHbk= =2rOz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1672485.DI0ksurL32-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list