From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gg45p-0003BV-IC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:48:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA3IlkPh030759; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:47:46 GMT Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA3IjBH2014696 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:45:11 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:43184 helo=blashyrk) by ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:465) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1Gg42H-0004jl-Nb (Exim 4.63) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path ); Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:45:01 +0000 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:45:11 +0000 From: Stephen Bennett To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior Message-ID: <20061103184511.34703e90@blashyrk> In-Reply-To: <200611030229.46220.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200611030229.46220.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.6 (GTK+ 2.10.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" X-Archives-Salt: c4926240-ed0c-4752-bb7c-46d13d83f723 X-Archives-Hash: 3656d56777f8cc75cbd5a812606cfd13 On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 02:29:45 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > so to recap, the fix here changes it back to the historically > documented behavior that the implicit RDEPEND happens in ebuilds > regardless of what eclasses do Do it please. The current behaviour is retarded however you look at it. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list