From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18519-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1Gfykd-0005Re-RJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:06:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA3D4ilq030117; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:04:44 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA3D2BTO016615 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:02:12 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D627644CF for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13318 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2006 07:59:59 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2006 07:59:59 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:02:16 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200611030229.46220.vapier@gentoo.org> <454B014A.8070203@gentoo.org> <1162546352.8060.45.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1162546352.8060.45.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1387871.gXxtBaspcU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611030802.16935.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5479ec4f-7089-45f6-a205-f8ce2a12cb92 X-Archives-Hash: b391a5c84030f3a53f7ad7be3b000117 --nextPart1387871.gXxtBaspcU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 03 November 2006 04:32, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote: > On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > > Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current > > get from eclasses. > > I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and > RDEPEND from eclass. that is the behavior that we'd be moving to -mike --nextPart1387871.gXxtBaspcU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARUs92EFjO5/oN/WBAQKOGA/+P9JiNRYsxxaPw3Dz5cyqLnIsUEcBwwnq 6AaiIE1DAbQpAHbmCV7V+nsTxzhsDuMGMZudB0Q2Z8H1X36CIwNdj8/RDXOF359Y sHAgkisZyif59tWlezwgzRoO4EUrXS6S4VbvkWzrYnJxWU35R82eeMfLUrX/1HML KAS1tyqMyIT9YmA1cRlYgmH6nQFYgXp7JrkzZ89iu8Rilcwj+RAhqzy9CfyYzrYr 3L57i1L2IF9HKCTOiRTgbQ48CTeLEBVs5ZJcoEML7wMPI+Xb+HwBzuYre/uVsTuL QRFXcZX0exWK4StsNwmfwUrl0k4u8UdK9bmbfon//H4AVfvMnvDZeXbhIpgL8EcK WMRFF9tmXv3qNw/YXY4GuXVzqQgFR/Z1HtVG8vk5K6C8KGm6ywQd0LNg0/udxEsV piP0Znie3KAj9vVwC/Y+Omm8TxHUI7Wll9JRjCxcT0EN2uGZ64kXrU8+dZh00ycQ C9EmcitbCEwIn789qjHWJReaD8FOIkzPfH3h03YLPHom/mmVbtKgJ24xBsQObYHn 8lzwiVjYz5bbxxqrzn27csHzOCi45HFgOc4mS7J4/bwDlNH+O0ZvIJ6xKUQlYlbf QtHtHmNxzJqpMtD+DiQ7F6CrJpMCABbRg22NnlEMU/6vKaUoFLxTvT1fjagflITm TdSIWPKESoI= =pxIC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1387871.gXxtBaspcU-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list