From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18519-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1Gfykd-0005Re-RJ
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:06:28 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA3D4ilq030117;
	Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:04:44 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA3D2BTO016615
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:02:12 GMT
Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D627644CF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  3 Nov 2006 13:02:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 13318 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2006 07:59:59 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2)
  by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2006 07:59:59 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:02:16 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <200611030229.46220.vapier@gentoo.org> <454B014A.8070203@gentoo.org> <1162546352.8060.45.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1162546352.8060.45.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1387871.gXxtBaspcU";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200611030802.16935.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 5479ec4f-7089-45f6-a205-f8ce2a12cb92
X-Archives-Hash: b391a5c84030f3a53f7ad7be3b000117

--nextPart1387871.gXxtBaspcU
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 03 November 2006 04:32, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current
> > get from eclasses.
>
> I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and
> RDEPEND from eclass.

that is the behavior that we'd be moving to
-mike

--nextPart1387871.gXxtBaspcU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
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=pxIC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1387871.gXxtBaspcU--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list