From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GexXV-000711-PA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:36:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9VHXTbM026646; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:33:29 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9VHSeFP010646 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:28:40 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17A48D305 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:50:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25325-10 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:50:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from posidon.ferdyx.org (posidon.ferdyx.org [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877788D304 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:50:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by posidon.ferdyx.org (nbSMTP-1.01-cvs) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) ferdy@gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:28:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:28:31 +0100 From: "Fernando J. Pereda" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Message-ID: <20061031172831.GB5468@ferdyx.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20061031003334.50376630@snowdrop.home> <200610310857.02169.linux@quanteam.info> <20061031150236.7b080211@snowdrop.home> <454773F6.9020605@gentoo.org> <20061031163244.2ffd9201@blashyrk> <45478062.7080109@gentoo.org> <20061031170521.6b650cc9@blashyrk> <45478562.3000706@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45478562.3000706@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ferdyx.org X-Archives-Salt: d12fc2e4-b4ae-4d5f-bef2-4b77f1c9ba3f X-Archives-Hash: 55feb128e72c4cb1465ff2ac74d81f75 --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 06:18:26PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: > Sure I did... Could you tell me why should we accumulate broken and > vulnerable junk in the tree for years? (Outdated ebuild A depends on > junky outdated ebuild B which depends on crappy, unsupported ebuilds C, > D and E which... ) Thats not the maintainer's problem but the Arch Team's problem so they are the ones that decide what to do. > Either keyword it in a reasonable time or you'll lose the keyword, damn > simple... Can't do it in X months? Sorry, too bad for your arch, the > package is gone and users will rant (or they won't, and then you don't > need the keywords in the first place). No. Arch Teams manage their keywords the way _they_ want not the way YOU or others that don't work on arch teams want. It is actually *that* simple. - ferdy --=20 Fernando J. Pereda Garcimart=EDn Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git) 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFR4e/CkhbDGC9KNQRAph9AJ9cmObr+xWEfSJtDRnwg7fzQ5JmagCfVIMg HZMjHlyBIJyWAwIM3s+gORw= =8iQe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list