From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GeoXd-0004QF-4j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:00:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9V7xHZO008242; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:59:17 GMT Received: from atom.dmkhost.net (atom.dmkhost.net [67.15.82.32]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9V7vLsh018845 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:57:21 GMT Received: from quanteam.pl ([195.60.65.10]:52768 helo=[192.168.0.50]) by atom.dmkhost.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52) id 1GeoV7-0007C3-7B for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:57:37 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?q?Pawe=B3_Madej?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:57:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <45468ED1.8050107@gentoo.org> <20061031003334.50376630@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20061031003334.50376630@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610310857.02169.linux@quanteam.info> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - atom.dmkhost.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - quanteam.info X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k9V7vLsh018845 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k9V7xHbD008242 X-Archives-Salt: 3a8b4ca1-105b-47ad-896d-965fb257e421 X-Archives-Hash: da82126af395c06097f475f6b7118ff6 Dnia wtorek, 31 pa=BCdziernika 2006 01:33, Ciaran McCreesh napisa=B3: > The thing is, at any given time there are probably a hundred or more > bugs assigned to arch teams with people whining for attention. At least > two thirds of those whines are unhelpful and serve no purpose. > Filtering out the legitimate calls for attention would take even more > time away from fixing the things. > > So, unless you can recruit somebody *good* to let the arch teams know > which bugs should be prioritised, the only thing that increasing > communication would do is decrease the number of bugs that get fixed. I'm not a dev but I suppose i got resolution for that problem. Lets make=20 another subproject (don't know how to name it properly) in bugzilla in wh= ich=20 there will be only bugs affected by security flaw. That bugs will have=20 highest priority from every other ones. And devs would have to look at th= em=20 firstly --=20 Pawe=B3 Madej (Nysander) --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list