From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GepOf-0005db-5i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:55:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9V8sBWb013583; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:54:11 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9V8qIV5000978 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:52:18 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A7B646B6 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30203 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2006 03:51:12 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2006 03:51:12 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:52:13 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200610310302.53825.vapier@gentoo.org> <200610310938.28939.linux@quanteam.info> In-Reply-To: <200610310938.28939.linux@quanteam.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4026422.Mdk65dGKAM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200610310352.13909.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 90371ee9-4396-43b3-a155-df10c3751ee7 X-Archives-Hash: 3312774c6673f6a8fa2baecc7f7fc57f --nextPart4026422.Mdk65dGKAM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 31 October 2006 03:38, Pawe=C5=82 Madej wrote: > Dnia wtorek, 31 pa=C5=BAdziernika 2006 09:02, Mike Frysinger napisa=C5=82: > > On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:57, Pawe=C5=82 Madej wrote: > > > I'm not a dev but I suppose i got resolution for that problem. Lets > > > make another subproject (don't know how to name it properly) in > > > bugzilla > > > > you mean like the "Gentoo Security" bugzilla product ? > > Yes that could be that - As I checked there are lack of unneeded noise > bugs. So devs could concentrate on important ones. sorry, i dont get it we already have the products available for people to sort arch bugs=20 between "stabilize random pkg for fun" and "stabilize random pkg for=20 security" ... in fact, the bug e-mails that go out even have headers in the= m=20 so people can filter into different folders =2Dmike --nextPart4026422.Mdk65dGKAM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARUcOvUFjO5/oN/WBAQLaTxAAt4pJ5gNdfvQ2TORjOQbNSeA6swUVZLBU 7NTUYKQOYX1CC6WCRw32nuMnGI1arhDisKb2G4ATkVhWk3hZLr5Aw2j7jfBJAGoO pX5xkDs8R4tXgLtaYjOAvdfdlNw4Hh63bH72wm1PvJ4BGFXsL9L7C0VD01PBWwyI YOmEMNQA2r3ucikUFwG5YFKYkSubrsyjWI5h0w1vdlBRWALUQ28w/qeqtaCsaceU axwOjTQgaqFwp3qCRvI4DEqo0M/9t3YFsBQYEVGnHy7u7aMXTxgE4ikSZ7Pw5h2R 2wtz8BIlgSDd22bx0QcaTTFXQziOyRdQVBOedmqz9qVBwngoFHUK3HE7gpspnGay AsvvSe8eoIWUC/9UcPAcY/Drf20AfINTPi3mRiShJBmH+lrHQKD4ych3TbFNk+X3 /oT8CMq95IbVZXbDp79In3k8IyVlINPoA7t3UVwfOsMJRUL/KxdSlFn5RHyBEen6 Sx85M/hrlwqqYa5uhj8+/xX75ogf3Zuq/DRsX0P2a0JXuIKd1nrkYmtqW8RkKYB9 ET6t9Xy+r3B4CZlaoBLMWRJxOFqq3dkubn5XhwACcjOgdAerjI+W/zgObgMZ5K+6 gzcbEgYSnQaaA+7ty855CfsdFzQjlTSaHpALEpZaRdUAtSTozNW53SieEkrXFUzM vWvX4X72YKg= =A+Sm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4026422.Mdk65dGKAM-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list