From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-17672-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1GXy9E-00009U-Sv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:50:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9CAnJYu019920; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:49:19 GMT Received: from ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.134]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9CAkPjh028636 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:46:25 GMT X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:44297 helo=localhost) by ppsw-4.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.154]:25) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:spb42) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1GXy4w-0006cl-FC (Exim 4.63) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org (return-path <spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:46:18 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:57:51 +0100 From: Stephen Bennett <spb@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42? Message-ID: <20061012115751.6fdee1af@localhost> In-Reply-To: <b38c6f4c0610120152w942f7f8q7194082f4ae944c8@mail.gmail.com> References: <51c6d3c5867563dbcdcc62370def11d0@myrddraal.demon.co.uk> <452D2BC9.5060207@gentoo.org> <15FCAB01-0915-4FB7-BD31-189212346F96@gentoo.org> <20061011194442.4c0bd8d9@snowdrop.home> <1160595003.10524.21.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20061011204619.0c58fdf1@snowdrop.home> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0610111551180.1206@rutrow.coat.com> <20061011212633.30942d25@snowdrop.home> <b38c6f4c0610111408k61ee8effqb75e13665c94049d@mail.gmail.com> <20061011233447.2ee81aef@localhost> <b38c6f4c0610120152w942f7f8q7194082f4ae944c8@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.3 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "S.P. Bennett" <spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk> X-Archives-Salt: 65c61c0d-7010-4dcf-b037-462d266fff8f X-Archives-Hash: 725ab84d9b1e9d0802f269c0e78c52b4 On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:52:42 +0100 "Stuart Herbert" <stuart.herbert@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sorry, are you telling everyone that it's too difficult for you to > write an ungreedy regex that also tests for the possibility of a list > bounded by [ and ] being part of an atom? No. I'm saying that it's more effort than simply tokenising by spaces, and that there's absolutely no benefit in making anyone expend that effort. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list