From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GVOTk-0003KQ-KF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:21:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k958KJJu018649; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:20:19 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k958IJCQ012405 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:18:19 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id p27so160364ugc for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:18:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=gpxhDMCLntaZn4LHglSr8u2vE1dePqZpBZ8/HswKeuA5Bmb9LfFVffXZwCj4Bo1RB4hR3Qlx6j/vvkDCdy7Xnk/vc8u0dIp3emAUeQP+158rHsbEany13saiMzG9N0a79hwPXvQ7DklqSm8ZJqFc4Uu39K/4JK9CK3xUt8a99YE= Received: by 10.67.29.12 with SMTP id g12mr1611944ugj; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.80.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1sm443407uge.2006.10.05.01.18.18; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:18:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proxy maintainers (was: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:18:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061004070014.843d851d.tcort@gentoo.org> <4524ABAE.2000407@gentoo.org> <1160035599.809.87.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1160035599.809.87.camel@localhost> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1813648.mPe89dxuY7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200610051018.15187@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 06700063-fe0e-44b1-bf64-deaee0a0b647 X-Archives-Hash: 1df3abd60ea5764ecc9b171bc476d7a2 --nextPart1813648.mPe89dxuY7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:06, Natanael Copa wrote: > When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as "maintainer update") to > freebsd ports, its normally committed within hours, even if its not a > popular port. When I submit fixes for packages in Gentoo bugzilla it get > stuck for months. They must have done something right. I keep from stating my uncensored opinion about a good part of FreeBSD port= s,=20 and just say that their patch policy, as well as the one of pkgsrc that is= =20 another comparable system, is totally different from ours, and does not=20 consider upstream presence. And I suppose I can say that with quite enough information at hand,=20 considering that I deal with ports every time a package fails to build on=20 G/FBSD .. the problem is most of the times I cannot make use of the patches= =20 used by ports because they are, if not broken, sub-optimal. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... --nextPart1813648.mPe89dxuY7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFJL/He2h1+2mHVWMRAm50AKCeb9xs0a9FGFbzYJ81Fcm7W8upDQCgj0+L y5lmhqpjvF9K2mdNpkOLVpA= =34WZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1813648.mPe89dxuY7-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list