From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-17290-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GU5nC-0006Q6-V4
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:11:59 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k91I9qhJ017363;
	Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:09:52 GMT
Received: from mxout005.mail.hostpoint.ch (mxout005.mail.hostpoint.ch [217.26.49.184])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k91I71jB002890
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:07:01 GMT
Message-Id: <200610011807.k91I71jB002890@robin.gentoo.org>
Received: from [10.0.2.17] (helo=asmtppi002.mail.hostpoint.ch)
	by mxout005.mail.hostpoint.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <dev-zero@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GU5iO-0000D5-Vc
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:07:01 +0200
Received: from [80.238.131.100] (helo=bailiff.coruscant.local)
	by asmtppi002.mail.hostpoint.ch with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <dev-zero@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GU5iO-000FHw-KY
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:07:00 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender-Id: tm@dev-zero.ch
From: Tiziano =?UTF-8?B?TcO8bGxlcg==?= <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:07:51 +0200
References: <efoeet$apv$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061001142733.0a8b4eac@snowdrop.home> <200610011755.k91HtuS8027001@robin.gentoo.org> <20061001190151.29df3afc@snowdrop.home>
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k91I9qjC017363
X-Archives-Salt: cd477afa-a9c7-460d-b7ce-6649a1425c17
X-Archives-Hash: 1b5fd172471505fe45066cf8cd5f2c8c

Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:23:16 +0200 Tiziano M=C3=BCller <dev-zero@gentoo=
.org>
> wrote:
> | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:04:52 +0200 Tiziano M=C3=BCller
> | > <dev-zero@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | > | Now, SCONSOPTS (BJAMOPTS respectively) could be added to make.con=
f
> | > | and used whenever one of those build-systems is being used. But w=
e
> | > | would probably have to add a ...OPTS for every build-system.
> | >=20
> | > Does BJAM parallelisation actually work reliably these days?
> |
> | Well, it seems to work for boost.
>=20
> How well have you tested? It used to have issues on real SMP systems
> with lots of CPUs (-j32), which is why I ask...
>=20
Well, I have a poor P4 CPU here and building with -j3. But if you have a
login for me on such a machine, I'll test it.

Tiziano


--=20
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list