From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GTet2-0002h2-Rs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:28:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8UDRKRi028363; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:27:20 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8UDPPPp013447 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:25:25 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p46so1613764nfa for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:25:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=cLcL9BNVdhG/+6wNi/6HFZU+PmPLcMuaMDIefOUGfVPqjJYU405csp/MT3fsqwhxZ+mFpivuXaCpPVLRTgtBIJoP7UQO5ZS2uQzqacjnIZUoIEWI5NVUx4nTFeaOiSuhmpt1X8hy24TgF6GtCXpWGLnYRNU59kDZgXUkoe8sn9w= Received: by 10.48.254.10 with SMTP id b10mr3057738nfi; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.80.66]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id r33sm10136813nfc.2006.09.30.06.25.21; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:25:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:25:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200609300640.14616@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200609301440.49148@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060930141433.3e892046@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060930141433.3e892046@snowdrop.home> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1730503.b3nuIOsE0W"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609301525.15965@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 6e9a522a-fdd4-4329-ad3e-b6c1fed1dc02 X-Archives-Hash: e7e8daee5dbc373b575c78efd56e273c --nextPart1730503.b3nuIOsE0W Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 30 September 2006 15:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > It is not a change in policy. It's a codification of existing practice. The behaviour of portage seems to ask you to differ on this. But you also s= eem=20 to lose your point. I'm discussing the change of behaviour with respect to portage, not the cha= nge=20 to devmanual. Why am I not questioning the change to devmanual? Because the= =20 bug there is just required by Plasmaroo who act as a proxy between QA and=20 devmanual itself, and thus not up to discuss anymore than a CVS commit. But, the behaviour change for profiles (that currently, for bug or design,= =20 acts in a different way than your "existing practice" suggest) is up to=20 debate, as I've found a few reasons not to back up such a change, and rathe= r=20 stick with the current behaviour. So, again, why should we change the behaviour, other than to fullfill your= =20 request? =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart1730503.b3nuIOsE0W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFHnA7e2h1+2mHVWMRAt6nAJ9+LrY57Xs4nzjK6pmdLj6cvMMVnQCgiHS0 Jabjg/2ZZZClTNUpVdbk4tE= =+XNN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1730503.b3nuIOsE0W-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list