From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GTelr-0007pv-2o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:20:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8UDIwaV006229; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:18:58 GMT Received: from outmail.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8UDEgm9022607 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:14:42 GMT Received: from snowdrop.home (unknown [62.6.163.66]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37821543B3 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:14:42 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:14:33 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask Message-ID: <20060930141433.3e892046@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200609301440.49148@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> References: <200609300640.14616@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060930132521.106de32c@snowdrop.home> <200609301440.49148@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_AiQiSni7zEB6j9320h0/vjp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 7968ae24-de91-428e-9d3b-02b5bfb78197 X-Archives-Hash: a0077de9586d807fe16b1982d2ca9cd7 --Sig_AiQiSni7zEB6j9320h0/vjp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:40:44 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2" wrote: | On Saturday 30 September 2006 14:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D149536#c4 | | You bring up the point that you don't take any argument? |=20 | The argument is still valid, nobody provided a reason for the change. It is not a change in policy. It's a codification of existing practice. Unfortunately, since most of this stuff didn't get written up years ago when it happened, not everyone is aware of said practice and so a few profiles from developers who weren't around at the time don't honour it. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=3D13 --Sig_AiQiSni7zEB6j9320h0/vjp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFHm3A96zL6DUtXhERArS2AJ9+UbeKEnXBFJt4FbHwKR3GUuu31wCg50Or YVmdgfL0+5TesTxiQYsfiPg= =o2ra -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_AiQiSni7zEB6j9320h0/vjp-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list