From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GR85d-0001yv-IO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:02:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8NE1rZ2006795; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:01:53 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8NDxL3q014933 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:59:21 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BA96490B for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11219 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2006 09:57:56 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2006 09:57:56 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC about another *DEPEND variable Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:59:17 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <45126B07.6030403@gentoo.org> <20060923131411.GA12282@seldon> <200609230950.13347.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200609230950.13347.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3014400.QHJhQGsssq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609230959.17472.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 719875c2-ef6c-43d5-a1f2-e07d381307a4 X-Archives-Hash: 7719d8740c121428cd475dc074f3e55c --nextPart3014400.QHJhQGsssq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 23 September 2006 09:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 23 September 2006 09:14, Brian Harring wrote: > > We don't classify our deps as actual build depends vs link depends; as > > such trying to (essentially) "patch things up after" allow for the > > scenario where merging breaks the toolchain, thus building isn't > > possible. > > huh ? RDEPEND is linktime ... see my statement above lemme rephrase ... you keep the ABI SONAME lib around until all packages ar= e=20 done with it; this does not affect any other package (including upgrades to= =20 the same package) as the ABI filename is unique in the filesystem it is not used at linktime because it does not provide a linkable file ... = it=20 merely provides the library used at runtime so you can upgrade on the fly as the old ABI lib does not conflict with=20 anything =2Dmike --nextPart3014400.QHJhQGsssq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARRU9tUFjO5/oN/WBAQLTCQ//Slzj+gNsB4+sZXCJTtw9chP40LcBSQuA FshVeuvQUL8ZxhGggkWkATQB07GdOAC3nM1r/4fy4iBhk9g10t5KcPUdOt0/hp0l NopzBbe/HUklYMzpNaD4cWfFmb9mTJldJC8Fpahu9DpMU1VBtmle7Rt3mzQ9yOaV G1DhmOARYDIq0XwPL/X0JSNbnUASvED4HHLWEb/cnzMCrP0acw3XNNcrH+lJyUd0 VJ4EdqXrNhN77yKfbaV0ECGbgu7NoADgLNPeP46M5yb0w3QohuaD5dBAF9kFjcgi AMeiCvTuqmvBaB/E8e7zQk9SVorX32rECZmA5howscSRsi0keZ/YcOjKPh27am1V 2Pt5mr+u2XC8AFfbTyv7or13ozk1EZSfuDWXvjV3q33ksfo9Xz0j5G03/rNMqEoS J7qJVaCz4SMlTVpI7TPcxDk2Za68MHm6TcTCPqaKp+98Hpb6JfHDIWWP6gomH0Wg wkNnzyFPdYUcxFokgW6ztMPaCAKmhAKZGnQEbCpfA4lH+xyAkKy/p4+DbEsjcGrU hIMMHeJ4kRruRQF2qjSD//RBjyxGL8FbxY3iAtcFoAUlLpp+NepY/t1Ij3vcdaoD ii8kV26H9FSyQYnd/8++LVNHVWf/bUy8HFvIwvXGM8PS5ZwweIyWxWth8KnL49Fm 28aU3LBSKww= =4H0K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3014400.QHJhQGsssq-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list