From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQQ8I-0007Rw-TX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:06:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8LF55l3029731; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:05:05 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8LF1h54031453 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:01:43 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2016432F for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4877 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2006 11:00:55 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 21 Sep 2006 11:00:55 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC about another *DEPEND variable Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:01:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <45126B07.6030403@gentoo.org> <200609211040.10347.vapier@gentoo.org> <4512A791.7060606@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4512A791.7060606@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2190340.QHRWPcF7Ul"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609211101.41237.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 13465ba3-c048-4128-922f-f8131503c30a X-Archives-Hash: 0cd2a0f1bb11807b534cac66abf075a5 --nextPart2190340.QHRWPcF7Ul Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:54, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Yes, I agree with you. For example, take expat. The maintainers have > refused to allow both versions to exist simultaneously on a system > because it apparently causes more breakage than just breaking every app > on your system by removing .so.0. that is the exact case portage should be handling for you it would go "oh hey, check out libexpat.so.0 ... some things seem to want=20 it ... HEY USER, you need to rebuild: xxxxxxxx" ... once all the packages=20 still consuming libexpat.so.0 are rebuilt, portage could silently trim it=20 from the system complicated ? not really, scanelf can produce all this information in an=20 easily digestable format =2Dmike --nextPart2190340.QHRWPcF7Ul Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARRKpVUFjO5/oN/WBAQIpoxAArBgDtHWlCsxsIFOVQGOGwy69Qx+13uPt R+V8BSCpV06bZJO2qG4ko6Pp6bNBlarzNWFiFIpb4S8D4OBGYaM+3OdBoc7OyesF Ak5+6bKVUCp+l9sO/w2hpdqV/L48ddxhF0GRLr+nJpi9ESSKsiQI9dOljGu5IzBg 5OvT5sxfMIoP+QSwlM+2wi+deZNmBb26zPlOynds8uUHy5HrLLCdvpiGFu2NDdbX ASibF4DWRervWtFqBGKUaw0pSEzOJilH/MbGMfYBbHwNku+9EUMPPGbkb7IfQM3V M3jwL7mHwog18rt8GaFR1SIvonTTkPehX/TXXh66sszMtRTWkXGpjbCMrAjApVsz T2NYjWBsmYDgHbdFtk2k1d4bkE8v7150MMDVXWX+o051s96w5h9Ym2ftPWpmRIto VOnxqe8mMtrDZ1nPPIHCXlEPI7OVlOWepo4wcn+3zS1k/NBTXbkTFLIkupKjtlCd 2UVBMdOgstHALGsPwXmHSqfZK6XDGAKhP2Krj/Lyvvk+IjFQdaKYxkZegku0smic n9A/Q0XW0pEtAjHLtDBLQCFeHWJHuEvBu6QYfw9xtuZEHBW1X2R7+UNJyRCcac/p Nqu+J9vjwdl/66bG8nHoRAYH4INW3e6BOGED90Ml1lNp9CMu0YAZM2lmVTTCgH/K uBT+zXjto04= =TKNW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2190340.QHRWPcF7Ul-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list