From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQPnQ-0002rN-4Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:45:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8LEhRXB016292; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:43:27 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8LEeElD019041 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:40:14 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11182648A8 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18727 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2006 10:39:25 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 21 Sep 2006 10:39:25 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC about another *DEPEND variable Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:40:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <45126B07.6030403@gentoo.org> <200609210952.27835.vapier@gentoo.org> <45129E58.8090701@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <45129E58.8090701@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1913949.V8lzK0t2Gf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609211040.10347.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f5302dcc-74ab-4c10-a847-c03aee8c4c27 X-Archives-Hash: 637d1979b8e7a354053ae2c254e4c19e --nextPart1913949.V8lzK0t2Gf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:14, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Not adding it into the ebuild means that it's impossible to show in > advance what packages will actually be installed, because you don't know > whether the sover will bump. sometimes you dont know as the ABI bump may be arch or feature specific ...= =20 pathological case i agree ;) you would certainly know between the time you merge the new one and unmerge= =20 the old one though ... but now we tread into the territory of "portage shou= ld=20 not unmerge ABI libraries until all consumers have been destroyed" which is= =20 better than the current craptastic situation of "you gotta revdep-rebuild=20 after the fact with a broken system" =2Dmike --nextPart1913949.V8lzK0t2Gf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARRKkSkFjO5/oN/WBAQI9jQ//VaCwdGeU846FUXbBwe+ICPrRtg9sfDI+ Cn8yFumSSZtM6qSz8wXu4qHE7PjsJ/1xT8fMsMekskQGpYToLoPXNVgPr6gKUNvE ZT5IROopjNmU1kOfWtx8sRsmiawmyd5A+o1Z83hRw53NiMKubOPVYnDn9aIWAKsL lNjB6LB4/LjoDqK0frgaCobkncenzfthrdR8dRmDQO6iDhmajyKZ89cvvde1kttE 28vJ6JNOLscB1uOJcjJLX/MJIByEmUvhRRjLQqEVdc/fQo6ZHAD3RuvjVDNwNf8i u3DMKX8yUkEts/O2uKfJ1CuQgZe3GNWy7gmJlQ9t7WTq1qNef4vYHJQ82WLC0aQF tVFSCTn16NG+8btRpOK6keQy9iWdXA68NMLdPafngjfd8ccuRk/tTLcUGR7imrOW SSvzB6Kns6DvMvuJONZS6J4d9y96ev3QrjV01GTFg2SpmxrnvP56erHKi+tPBYlY QRPn5NZCTNpY66VsR/xo8nKbkshGtxAIBHHaAparpczT7GOkflGrrYApqK0jrKu9 unjIEDIy8Ux/Y96lbjqRMqGswZUmF4M3L+EwSxPH4NXjvXz/txgpqBUAw61WzAWp R9BA+GYt7rnwpj+mqYMqy4tPi3mzlc1Ahv5Gl1b04qbkFRlZtzfWKG5Ascve1gY0 f/NhSZfQ4sQ= =onsY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1913949.V8lzK0t2Gf-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list