From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQ9Sq-0000zG-N3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:18:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8KLHA8W022632; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:17:10 GMT Received: from outmail.freedom2surf.net (outmail1.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8KLDcTl029396 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:13:38 GMT Received: from snowdrop.home (unknown [62.6.163.66]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB475118A for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:13:38 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:13:33 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds Message-ID: <20060920221333.52ccd7d4@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <4511A767.3010504@gentoo.org> References: <429613795-1158764726-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-1614084655-@bxe050-cell01.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <200609192122.29838.mattm@gentoo.org> <20060920212715.5e82c91d@snowdrop.home> <4511A767.3010504@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_HR9BmRwElK2DhN4vi2Esg5y; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 99c288d1-c5e9-469a-9d22-f5ba2da657e9 X-Archives-Hash: 9be5ab70e6a5ee8b00f3b6d1884aa590 --Sig_HR9BmRwElK2DhN4vi2Esg5y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:41:11 +0200 Jakub Moc wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > I was under the impression that you were supposed to GLEP anything | > of this scope and get council approval... The "anyone can make a | > project" rule doesn't replace the requirement to GLEP large changes. | >=20 |=20 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/xml_source/flame.xml - Code Listing | 1.12 |=20 | WTF really... That Chris White has used a poorly written and terribly thought out GLEP as an alternative to doing things properly does not mean that GLEPs are wrong. By quoting that ridiculous document you are contributing nothing to the discussion. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org --Sig_HR9BmRwElK2DhN4vi2Esg5y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFEa8A96zL6DUtXhERAqMIAKCgmpGxOATJY0KidV7/SJWPdQ9q1QCg3DIs Yccz9z+gcyBQu8wLiLLiMVM= =E3Yn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_HR9BmRwElK2DhN4vi2Esg5y-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list