From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQ9m5-0000Vi-9Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:38:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8KLb46N018859; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:37:04 GMT Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.154]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8KLXNL4014140 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:33:24 GMT Received: from local (adsl-67-116-185-130.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net[67.116.185.130]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20060920213322m1400512tve>; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:33:22 +0000 From: Chris White Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:33:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <429613795-1158764726-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-1614084655-@bxe050-cell01.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <20060920212715.5e82c91d@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060920212715.5e82c91d@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3488816.LXPrFEB3Ol"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609201433.18413.chriswhite@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a40d69ff-9793-45ad-8681-39cd49911279 X-Archives-Hash: 7e84464853fbbe4ea146365fd6432762 --nextPart3488816.LXPrFEB3Ol Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 20 September 2006 13:27, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > I was under the impression that you were supposed to GLEP anything of > this scope and get council approval... The "anyone can make a project" > rule doesn't replace the requirement to GLEP large changes. Why? It's in an overlay so it's not actually part of the Gentoo project, i= t's=20 using existing methods with a difference in distribution formats to provide= =20 something that will be hopefully usefull to the community. I'm also sorry= =20 that you think my flame guide is a ... um.. GLEP(?). I guess I'm enhancing= =20 Gentoo by requesting that more llama action be put in GLEPS (rar?). =2D-=20 Chris White Gentoo Developer aka: xxxxxx (Scissors Were Here) xxxxxx --nextPart3488816.LXPrFEB3Ol Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFEbOeFdQwWVoAgN4RAjSkAJ0cDMx9hYLiE0B+m1PfywkL9urfXQCg+EHZ wLRi/46nvW+G4MQ0fpkb9C0= =0Wdl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3488816.LXPrFEB3Ol-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list