From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GNyRy-0001F6-9G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:08:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8EL7mah015764; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:07:48 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8EL4Fq2011700 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:04:16 GMT Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 739) id 7BFF0643B1; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:04:14 +0000 From: Bryan =?utf8?Q?=C3=98stergaard?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: devrel@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sunrise trusted committers with bugzilla access Message-ID: <20060914210414.GE12566@woodpecker.gentoo.org> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k8EL7mcV015764 X-Archives-Salt: dfe013f2-7097-4b1f-bec9-ca082b0051be X-Archives-Hash: 1d0dfccc926f0a947780d168e48db615 On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:39:16PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > To my fellow Gentoo developers, >=20 > in the Sunrise project we have some users who are ambitious and cotribu= te > more than a few ebuilds. Those regulars have the possibility to take th= e > ebuild quiz and acquire the title "Sunrise trusted committer". Those > sunrise committers can use extended bugzilla permissions to edit keywor= ds > EBUILD and REQUEST for example in the maintainer-wanted@ and > maintainer-needed@ bugzilla region where usually developers clean up li= tle > or have no interest in spending time on. >=20 > Now I tried to get this done with the "[GLEP] Bugzilla access for > contributors" and I was told it is to undefined and misses out the poin= t of > removing access levels again. Also I was told that a GLEP for this is > overkill. >=20 > All this is addressed and working with the current arch testers procedu= re. > The plan is to just treat Sunrise trusted committers the same as arch o= r > herd testers. The difference is that they operate on ebuilds of all > flavours that interest themself in the sunrise overlay and not on a cer= tain > herd of packages. Neither do they focus on testing for a specific > architecture. Just coding is their work, not testing - which explains t= he > difference in the name. >=20 > Now how do people feel about this approach? >=20 As there's been very little, if any, interest from anybody besides Stefan and Recruiters / Developer Relations I'm going to deny the contributor access idea. Recruiters and Developer Relations feels that this is a bad idea, especially seeing how hard it has been to reach any kind of resolution regarding who should get access and how we should solve the problems that I've outlined earlier. Regards, Bryan =C3=98stergaard --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list