From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GNWmF-000383-BM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:35:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8DFZPg2003255; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:35:25 GMT Received: from ccerelbas04.cce.hp.com (ccerelbas04.cce.hp.com [161.114.21.107]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8DFUg1K027113 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:30:42 GMT Received: from ccerelint01.cce.cpqcorp.net (smtp.guad.hp.com [16.110.74.103]) by ccerelbas04.cce.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD08A345AF for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:30:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from vino (vino.americas.hpqcorp.net [16.116.116.25]) by ccerelint01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C9AC34005 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:30:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: by vino (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:30:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:30:30 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] using -j1 with distcc? Message-ID: <20060913153029.GC5691@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20060913143451.GC25497@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060913143451.GC25497@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: d37a9f62-a667-4873-8691-212ce12f5eee X-Archives-Hash: 58a242955257bc12f743c95f2167eed0 --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Aron Griffis wrote: [Wed Sep 13 2006, 10:34:52AM EDT] > Unless somebody can explain how this is valid, I'll go ahead and fix > the bind ebuilds (where "fix" means "use -j1 unconditionally since > the Makefiles aren't parallel safe"). Maybe this was quick on my part, but I've gone ahead and fixed the ebuilds. They can always be "fixed back" if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty certain... Regards, Aron --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFCCQVJrHF4yAQTrARAgjhAJ99uCwLblKa2uQPJaDrIk+Q92uMTwCfceBM r5Al6ACACmVWLR+Mc/ke3qg= =M3+2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list