From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GNWlC-0005sR-Le for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:34:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8DFX8Jq023266; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:33:08 GMT Received: from ccerelbas01.cce.hp.com (ccerelbas01.cce.hp.com [161.114.21.104]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8DFTP8Y027719 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:29:26 GMT Received: from ccerelint01.cce.cpqcorp.net (smtp.guad.hp.com [16.110.74.103]) by ccerelbas01.cce.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49079340E1 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:29:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from vino (vino.americas.hpqcorp.net [16.116.116.25]) by ccerelint01.cce.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 058F434005 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:29:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: by vino (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:29:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:29:15 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] using -j1 with distcc? Message-ID: <20060913152914.GB5691@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20060913143451.GC25497@gentoo.org> <20060913145216.GA4779@seldon> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060913145216.GA4779@seldon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: d0c8f65d-fc7f-4397-81ee-8745e6105106 X-Archives-Hash: e4f651958208633892b6757b1034a3d5 --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian Harring wrote: [Wed Sep 13 2006, 10:52:17AM EDT] > Similar trickery in app-office/openoffice, although they enable -jN if=20 > distcc is enabled, else -j1 ... >=20 > Always wondered how that was valid, just avoid OO compiles enough it=20 > wasn't something I ever got around to looking into :) The openoffice ebuild is okay. It disables parallel builds by default, since openoffice isn't parallel safe. But the ebuild provides a sekrit variable WANT_DISTCC that can be set to use -j* from MAKEOPTS. In this case WANT_DISTCC is a misnomer but the technique isn't actually bad. Aron --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFCCPKJrHF4yAQTrARAhuuAJ9dq/RBujl+4MUuDTAqYnPwkUldygCgimXW GaV95sGsFoV39H5X5CwvOao= =mDJV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list