From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GMFFs-00059N-LW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:41:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8A2eRjh015513; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:40:27 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8A2cRCJ031762 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:38:27 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B17645A8 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22581 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2006 22:32:13 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 9 Sep 2006 22:32:13 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:38:31 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <450357DA.9090400@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <450357DA.9090400@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1187147.9TG29etJ6b"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609092238.32211.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 43d5700c-50ff-4a67-b51e-cc0c2959b2a3 X-Archives-Hash: 3fc1b52757c4ea7cff20f5d5bfc80d0b --nextPart1187147.9TG29etJ6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 09 September 2006 20:10, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > This is a formal notice that monolithic X is no longer supported. awesome ! > Developers with X-dependent packages may pull the || virtual/x11 section > and retain just the modular dep list. Monolithic X will receive no > further security updates, and is currently subject to at least one local > security vulnerability. so we're clear (cause i might have just missed it on irc) but there will be= =20 a "meta monolithic" ebuild right ? one that has all the same deps as what= =20 the current monolithic provides ? =2Dmike --nextPart1187147.9TG29etJ6b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARQN6qEFjO5/oN/WBAQLG2A/+LWMcAklNqfbSvB7WinlPPWXnTGQjVLiS IKQpW7TjAFnDWYYbj9/Knqda92zxP/bjYUjR10F2o+DdOv3Qz+Hnxjw9J7cN2TSm lSvDdgG6v5PDh7vjF0dWxMnUbI4oOhduI7YUbtWULeq0RYDXc+cwjI+5Ub6/QJCi E4rfq9/t1VafAkiBoE5F1Z3fdpN3SVHmTBmEM+ptKo8FxGhPZKenvmwP+9lKy/d3 XKWswxRjMjSbxDwFVJfo463NIv/+jN/mgs0lTJN+b5kKdJpQcEybmqsyH4YYDIgi ys+ibYKrlpu2jE2MuX+L4oEI4a6GrGRy3BlYJg//PKcvabK3SWxOC1WLjMKWvT2F Yb4pFH3ci3lox89sYjUEAXNixnCpKhqdaqO68SE/alu79zMrYpHrOlrcnM9gJ7Zp nUxTAC26yuVRtioAwEjm2TqgCHVZIA37E1F8vdQ1HsPOYhZqOTiVQlATYr0+Ult3 QfIq3l0l62ZCFLr6jw3aF/cbRQ9GvCuTMB5Z31Y2K9NUeNg9Hc+01ZTeFD2NoKCM cpVuXNl9TT+fLKVoGwzlMBXH8j/94CTpMLm/hdAeKpPgU1jcj8CMZ/eYaOLZJJZJ vntXzLu81jx0g+U0fT8l1vlt6oViqX5qkC3mbdZ0e5/fW+pBOieMugwa0A2t4Afa Q77fgUmf8qw= =Up9a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1187147.9TG29etJ6b-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list