From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GL9Nf-0007QI-51 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:12:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k872C4YX007631; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:12:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k872ABRC016679 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:10:11 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (c155080.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.155.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76141646A6 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:10:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 04:09:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20060903112049.29f5026e@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <20060903125107.GA8959@woodpecker.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1157602948.1MxG9Uf0Ba"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609070409.55884.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 95be0478-f7d0-418e-aa79-e9c81a68707e X-Archives-Hash: 5bfb6b947009b9d0a776c2af116ff58b --nextPart1157602948.1MxG9Uf0Ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:36, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > I am not adding stuff. I am fixing existing packages. And I am taking > responsibility. How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146626 Am I the only one who has a problem with this? Carsten --nextPart1157602948.1MxG9Uf0Ba Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBE/39zVwbzmvGLSW8RArq2AKCTltxf71kzsCygXUQWBVNHT1dWNQCdFGsT 01+m8/ZziKbtq2WwbbY8IfE= =c22I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1157602948.1MxG9Uf0Ba-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list