public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 20:10:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060907031029.GA31255@seldon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44FF85E1.8070409@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2214 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:37:21PM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> >On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:36, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> >>I am not adding stuff. I am fixing existing packages. And I am taking
> >>responsibility.
> >
> >How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here:
> >
> >https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146626
> >
> >Am I the only one who has a problem with this?
> 
> I find this not at all surprising considering that one of his recent 
> mentees failed so many of the ebuild quiz questions so badly as to be 
> outright denied (which is not at all the recruit's fault).  In any case, 
> if you don't appreciate Stefan "taking responsibility" for stuff which 
> he has no business touching in the first place, you have every right to 
> tell him to piss off.

Maybe I'm just a moron (well, likely I am), but why are you two 
posting this shit on the dev ml?

Conflict for a change, fine, carlo go revert it. 

Crazy notion, but it's a one minute revert, yes it's not your mess but 
it is your package and _your_ users, leaving your users hanging 
because you're trying to make genstef clean something up screws the 
users over.

The proper forum for crap like this is via taking it up with 
QA/devrel.

Screaming about a change on the ml doesn't accomplish anything more 
then making you look like a jack ass trying to publically embarass 
someone you're pissed at; at least carlo has a reason, stephen you're 
just being an asshole.

Further, Stephen shouldn't even know about a candidates failing, let 
alone go stating it on a public ml.

Really nice one there; someone tries to help, deemed not yet skilled 
enough to have access to the tree, and you're bringing it up as a way 
to take potshots at genstef.

Further, you're taking a potshot at a dev candidate who via going 
through the process was at least *trying* to contribute, even if they 
didn't pass the quiz.

Carlo, go talk to devrel, stephen, go do your monthly mips stabling.
Meanwhile spare us the idiocy, and do something productive.

Screaming on a ml won't solve the conflict, just makes the screamer 
look childish.
~harring

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-07  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-03  9:20 [gentoo-dev] packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers Kevin F. Quinn
2006-09-03 10:12 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-03 11:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2006-09-03 12:51   ` Bryan Ãstergaard
2006-09-03 14:36     ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2006-09-06 23:35       ` Andrej Kacian
2006-09-07  2:09       ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-07  2:37         ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-09-07  3:10           ` Brian Harring [this message]
2006-09-07 11:29             ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-09-07 11:48               ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-07 13:25                 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-07 14:42                   ` Simon Stelling
2006-09-07 14:51                     ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-07 15:07                       ` Simon Stelling
2006-09-07 15:22                       ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-07 15:16                     ` Kevin F. Quinn
     [not found]                     ` <200609071726.54054.carlo@gentoo.org>
2006-09-07 15:37                       ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-07  3:13         ` Alec Warner
2006-09-07 11:09           ` Simon Stelling
2006-09-07  3:22         ` Luca Barbato
2006-09-07  5:58           ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2006-09-07 11:08             ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-07  9:11         ` [gentoo-dev] " Stuart Herbert
2006-09-07 10:17           ` Danny van Dyk
2006-09-07 10:21             ` Jon Portnoy
2006-09-07 11:05           ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-07 11:25         ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-07 13:26           ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-03 13:20   ` [gentoo-dev] " Kevin F. Quinn
2006-09-03 14:11     ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2006-09-03 13:55   ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
2006-09-03 14:22     ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2006-09-03 18:46       ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-09-03 23:54         ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2006-09-04  7:20           ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-09-07  3:10       ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2006-09-07  3:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060907031029.GA31255@seldon \
    --to=ferringb@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox