[gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Seemant Kulleen]

Dear All,

Trustees voting did actually finish over a month ago.  It's high time
for the official announcement.  This year's Board of Trustees for the
Gentoo Foundation has been reduced to 5 people, instead of 13.  That was
something we wanted a vote on, in addition to the regular board,
however, only 5 people were nominated.  Thus, they formed the new board:

I present to you, then, the new Board of Trustees:

Chris Gianelloni (wolf31o2)
Grant Goodyear (g2boojum)
Stuart Herbert (stuart)
Seemant Kulleen (seemant)
Renat Lumpau (rl03)

We will schedule the first Board Meeting for this year, for sometime
this month, hopefully.

Please note that the board is 60% new, so please do welcome the new
members.

Thanks!
-- 
Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Mike Doty]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Trustees voting did actually finish over a month ago.  It's high time
> for the official announcement.  This year's Board of Trustees for the
> Gentoo Foundation has been reduced to 5 people, instead of 13.  That was
> something we wanted a vote on, in addition to the regular board,
> however, only 5 people were nominated.  Thus, they formed the new board:
> 
> I present to you, then, the new Board of Trustees:
> 
> Chris Gianelloni (wolf31o2)
> Grant Goodyear (g2boojum)
> Stuart Herbert (stuart)
> Seemant Kulleen (seemant)
> Renat Lumpau (rl03)
> 
> We will schedule the first Board Meeting for this year, for sometime
> this month, hopefully.
> 
> Please note that the board is 60% new, so please do welcome the new
> members.
> 
> Thanks!
What vote?  I don't remember one.

- --
=======================================================
Mike Doty                      kingtaco -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead
Gentoo Developer Relations
Gentoo Recruitment Lead
Gentoo Infrastructure
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6  F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05
=======================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBRP2mx4BrouQZ9K4FAQKn5wP8D8oYKCUEGylukuyscbF8vRVatlz+f5/x
OGob+urHZT3YtPXZy4/JNH99n6yKu+6ZzeEFOYwdu1h11KzJLSej835SJefbiGjF
HQ1rwlDzpSfaXAklJKgwSyp8w/IuyKIRhjBfMS0D1CEYtHJjCVzWxDKzg2iHUMmT
4B9Erw2Wqwo=
=+scu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Seemant Kulleen]

There wasn't a vote, since the number of nominations equalled the number
of candidates.  There was a thread on gentoo-core mailing list with the
nominees, and the movement seemed to be toward simply accepting the
nominees as trustees.

Thanks,
-- 
Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Donnie Berkholz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 150 bytes --]

Mike Doty wrote:
> What vote?  I don't remember one.

5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?

Thanks,
Donnie


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Stephen P. Becker]

Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Doty wrote:
>> What vote?  I don't remember one.
> 
> 5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?

Hmm, wasn't there some sort of question as to whether or not simply
accepting them was valid under current policy?  I seem to recall that
somebody was going to look into this, but I could also be totally
smoking chriswhite's rainbow neon crack rock.

-Steve
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Stephen P. Becker]

Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Mike Doty wrote:
>>> What vote?  I don't remember one.
>> 5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?
> 
> Hmm, wasn't there some sort of question as to whether or not simply
> accepting them was valid under current policy?  I seem to recall that
> somebody was going to look into this, but I could also be totally
> smoking chriswhite's rainbow neon crack rock.

I just remembered something.  Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
declined)?

-Steve

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Stuart Herbert]

On 9/5/06, Stephen P. Becker <geoman@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I just remembered something.  Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
> leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
> declined)?

Yes I did.  There are a few things I want to achieve before I leave;
being on the Council would have been a distraction from that.

Best regards,
Stu
--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Michael Cummings]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 9/5/06, Stephen P. Becker <geoman@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I just remembered something.  Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
>> leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
>> declined)?
> 
> Yes I did.  There are a few things I want to achieve before I leave;
> being on the Council would have been a distraction from that.
> 
> Best regards,
> Stu
Not trying to be confused - its a natural state for me. Does this mean
you are not a trustee (declining the role) and so there is still 1 slot
open?

- --

- -----o()o----------------------------------------------
Michael Cummings   |    #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev    |    on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7  8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
- -----o()o----------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE/fN0q1ztTp5/Ti4RAn+IAJ9pwaaxIK4swxUv2vnSOE+vlwmMwwCcDPGI
zl6rI+mDUe/arl7n4/XsKZs=
=ndkM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Trustees Announcement

[Torsten Veller]

* Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org>:
> Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > On 9/5/06, Stephen P. Becker <geoman@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> I just remembered something.  Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
> >> leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
> >> declined)?
> > 
> > Yes I did.  There are a few things I want to achieve before I leave;
> > being on the Council would have been a distraction from that.
> > 
> Not trying to be confused - its a natural state for me. Does this mean
> you are not a trustee (declining the role) and so there is still 1 slot
> open?

No, you are mixing council and trustee.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Trustees Announcement

[Stephen P. Becker]

Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org>:
>> Stuart Herbert wrote:
>>> On 9/5/06, Stephen P. Becker <geoman@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>> I just remembered something.  Didn't Stuart say that he planned on
>>>> leaving Gentoo when he was nominated for the Council recently (and
>>>> declined)?
>>> Yes I did.  There are a few things I want to achieve before I leave;
>>> being on the Council would have been a distraction from that.
>>>
>> Not trying to be confused - its a natural state for me. Does this mean
>> you are not a trustee (declining the role) and so there is still 1 slot
>> open?
> 
> No, you are mixing council and trustee.

Actually, I *think* he was trying to ask why Stuart feels that he can
take on the responsibility of being a trustee if he felt that he didn't
have the time to take on the responsibility of being a council member.
I also must admit that I'm curious of the answer to that in light of the
fact that he admittedly plans on leaving Gentoo sometime soon.

-Steve
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Trustees Announcement

[Stuart Herbert]

On 9/6/06, Stephen P. Becker <geoman@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Actually, I *think* he was trying to ask why Stuart feels that he can
> take on the responsibility of being a trustee if he felt that he didn't
> have the time to take on the responsibility of being a council member.
> I also must admit that I'm curious of the answer to that in light of the
> fact that he admittedly plans on leaving Gentoo sometime soon.

To save everyone a bit of time, it'd be quicker just to read the
existing thread on -core where I explained why I was standing as a
trustee.

Best regards,
Stu
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Trustees Announcement

[Torsten Veller]

* Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@gmail.com>:
> To save everyone a bit of time, it'd be quicker just to read the
> existing thread on -core where I explained why I was standing as a
> trustee.

It was -nfp (<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.nfp/377>).
The list where this annoncement should have ... Anyway
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 372 bytes --]

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:08:22 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
<dberkholz@gentoo.org> wrote:
| Mike Doty wrote:
| > What vote?  I don't remember one.
| 
| 5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?

A Debian-style "reopen nominations" option with a vote would make more
sense...

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail            : ciaranm at ciaranm.org


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Seemant Kulleen]

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 18:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:08:22 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
> <dberkholz@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | Mike Doty wrote:
> | > What vote?  I don't remember one.
> | 
> | 5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among them?
> 
> A Debian-style "reopen nominations" option with a vote would make more
> sense...
> 

I wouldn't oppose this at all if that's what the foundation members
want.  However, this issue has languished on -core precisely due to
non-interest.  So if you can rile up the people to rise up and demand
this, or something, you'll definitely impress with me :)
-- 
Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Stephen Bennett]

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:40:26 -0700
"Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <iluxa@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Well, If there was such an option, which makes it more
> then just a popularity contest, I'd be voting.

Seconded.

> 
> Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 18:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >   
> >> On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:08:22 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
> >> <dberkholz@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> | Mike Doty wrote:
> >> | > What vote?  I don't remember one.
> >> | 
> >> | 5 nominees, 5 positions. Did you want a popularity contest among
> >> them?
> >>
> >> A Debian-style "reopen nominations" option with a vote would make
> >> more sense...
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > I wouldn't oppose this at all if that's what the foundation members
> > want.  However, this issue has languished on -core precisely due to
> > non-interest.  So if you can rile up the people to rise up and
> > demand this, or something, you'll definitely impress with me :)
> >   
> 
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Grant Goodyear]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 942 bytes --]

Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Tue Sep 05 2006, 12:17:20PM CDT]
> A Debian-style "reopen nominations" option with a vote would make more
> sense...

I'm not particularly opposed.  

In any event, we're going to need a way to identify foundation members.
I've asked agriffis to generate a list of members as of the last
election, and anybody not on that list who's been a dev for a year
is eligible to join.  My tentative plan was to have current and wannabe
members vote to approve or reject each of the nominees, and those who
are eligible who vote then become members of the Foundation.  If people
would prefer to simply have a "reopen nominations (yes/no)" vote, 
that would be fine with me.

I'm afk tomorrow, but I'll read any comments once I return.

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@gentoo.org
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Christel Dahlskjaer]

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 12:24 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Trustees voting did actually finish over a month ago.  It's high time
> for the official announcement.  This year's Board of Trustees for the
> Gentoo Foundation has been reduced to 5 people, instead of 13.  That was
> something we wanted a vote on, in addition to the regular board,
> however, only 5 people were nominated.  Thus, they formed the new board:
> 
> I present to you, then, the new Board of Trustees:
> 
> Chris Gianelloni (wolf31o2)
> Grant Goodyear (g2boojum)
> Stuart Herbert (stuart)
> Seemant Kulleen (seemant)
> Renat Lumpau (rl03)

"Welcome" and good luck to both new and old trustees :)


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Christel Dahlskjaer]

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 12:24 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Trustees voting did actually finish over a month ago.  It's high time
> for the official announcement.  This year's Board of Trustees for the
> Gentoo Foundation has been reduced to 5 people, instead of 13.  That was
> something we wanted a vote on, in addition to the regular board,
> however, only 5 people were nominated.  Thus, they formed the new board:
> 
> I present to you, then, the new Board of Trustees:
> 
> Chris Gianelloni (wolf31o2)
> Grant Goodyear (g2boojum)
> Stuart Herbert (stuart)
> Seemant Kulleen (seemant)
> Renat Lumpau (rl03)

"Welcome" and good luck to both new and old trustees :)


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

[Elfyn McBratney]

Ciao,

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:24:49PM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
 > Dear All,
 > 
 > Trustees voting did actually finish over a month ago.  It's high time
 > for the official announcement.  This year's Board of Trustees for the
 > Gentoo Foundation has been reduced to 5 people, instead of 13.  That was
 > something we wanted a vote on, in addition to the regular board,
 > however, only 5 people were nominated.  Thus, they formed the new board:
 > 
 > I present to you, then, the new Board of Trustees:
 > 
 > Chris Gianelloni (wolf31o2)
 > Grant Goodyear (g2boojum)
 > Stuart Herbert (stuart)
 > Seemant Kulleen (seemant)
 > Renat Lumpau (rl03)
 > 
 > We will schedule the first Board Meeting for this year, for sometime
 > this month, hopefully.
 > 
 > Please note that the board is 60% new, so please do welcome the new
 > members.

Congratulations, trustees - new and old! :D  Now where's my Free iPod? ;P

Best,
Elfyn

-- 
Elfyn McBratney,
Freenode and Gentoo Developer,
Nutty between the hours of 3AM and 14AM...
+----------------------------------+
|  irc.freenode.net / beu          |
|  beu [@] freenode [.] net        |
|  beu [@] gentoo [.] org          |
+-------------------------- o.0 ---+

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list