From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-16560-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GK8my-0005SV-Ip
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 07:22:36 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k847LtUP027961;
	Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:21:55 GMT
Received: from averell.tiscali.it (averell.tiscali.it [213.205.33.55])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k847K2ph030313
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:20:02 GMT
Received: from c1358217.kevquinn.com (84.222.86.2) by averell.tiscali.it (7.3.116)
        id 44EDBEEB000DF1B7 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:20:02 +0200
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:20:01 +0200
From: "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: packages going into the tree with  
 non-gentoo maintainers
Message-ID: <20060904092001.4dfe8fe2@c1358217.kevquinn.com>
In-Reply-To: <edfpvi$lmb$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <20060903112049.29f5026e@c1358217.kevquinn.com>
	<edeg01$4a2$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<200609031555.32262.pauldv@gentoo.org>
	<edeogp$qui$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20060903204616.2a25695d@c1358217.kevquinn.com>
	<edfpvi$lmb$1@sea.gmane.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_.g_B.uv3z4lr9qqN3Ne_1KK;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: 15cfc649-8031-43a5-a91a-c30b241c9357
X-Archives-Hash: 6dfae3d9ec0752c73b35e76f1b76410d

--Sig_.g_B.uv3z4lr9qqN3Ne_1KK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:54:33 -0600
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic.sk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > If you don't care whether a package is stable or not, just let the
> > arch team go ahead and do what they need to do to stabilise when
> > they wish to.  The role of package maintainer has nothing to do with
> > stabilisation, which is the preserve of the arch teams.
>=20
> Um, sure it does.  We're not going to stabilize something without=20
> attempting to contact the maintainer first.  If it's
> maintainer-needed we'll just go ahead though.

Yeah; I meant that ebuild maintainers don't do stabilisation, the arch
teams do, and that if the ebuild maintainer isn't interested in whether
the package is stable or not, they can leave it for the arch team (and
ATs) to do.

--=20
Kevin F. Quinn

--Sig_.g_B.uv3z4lr9qqN3Ne_1KK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE+9Oq9G2S8dekcG0RAkLXAKCQXUWezp7QduSkiLhzI4tdJj/TVwCcCUUt
ROHXIH849BFh5bJDIxA5moQ=
=sWeL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_.g_B.uv3z4lr9qqN3Ne_1KK--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list