From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJdrb-0006Lq-7g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:21:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k82MK4wj009788; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:20:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k82MGuUs008231 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:16:56 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (c190136.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.190.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628D765467 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:16:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The Age of the Universe Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:16:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <44F95E3E.9000708@gentoo.org> <200609021426.03618.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <44F988FB.3070001@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44F988FB.3070001@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2631966.ZjHgADvaiZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609030016.47911.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2fd9879a-49ae-4730-838c-f485d084c39b X-Archives-Hash: c175ee3ba97958ad42f0f51054722fbf --nextPart2631966.ZjHgADvaiZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Seems my message got swallowed... On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:36, Edgar Hucek wrote: > Just a side hint. Try to enable all flags at the first cimpile time would > reduce trys drasticaly ;) There are lots of use flag combinations incompatible with each other within= a=20 package as well as packages relying on other ones to be build with or witho= ut=20 use flags of other packages. The number of pssoble combinations would is to= o=20 high, even if we had build servers running around the clock. In case of point two, you're right, that it doesn't let Gentoo look good.=20 Neither Gnome nor KDE (no use flag in this case) accessibiliy stuff builds= =20 now - and bug 116030 is open since nine months. Partly the problem is that= =20 we're understaffed, partly - and this is my very personal opinion - the=20 problem is that releasing with GCC 4.x has been rushed - speak the notice=20 came one or two months too late. Carsten --nextPart2631966.ZjHgADvaiZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBE+gLPVwbzmvGLSW8RAvNRAJ9+XFGvZHPZkjnX73THRk87hNPApQCdF0Wu 6tbVcKV9fr86RFTelxRFYSA= =iJw1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2631966.ZjHgADvaiZ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list