public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:07:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200609021707.14077.carlo@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060901182608.GB9973@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1921 bytes --]

On Friday 01 September 2006 20:26, Greg KH wrote:
> So we are just fine, one of the advantages of being a source-based
> distro :)

Um, rereading term three of the GPL, you're right of course. The question 
remains how do we flag this. LICENSE="GPL-2 CDDL-Schily" in case of 
cdrtools!? Yes, the latter is the license file we have in the tree and 
looking at it, the only difference to the CDDL is that it includes an 
additional notice, which sets the court to Berlin, Germany.

Also we need to have a file that lists clashing licenses, so Portage (at least 
in a future, caring about licenses) will trow warnings, when binary packages 
get build. I mean we claim to be a meta-distribution, but I don't think 
projects basing their binary distributions on Gentoo can feel safe a bit with 
regards to lisensing. We do absolutely nothing to care for that right now.


While thinking about it, other issues came to my mind:

- Ciaran pushed for not installing license/copyright information 
in /usr/share/doc/${PF}. But a lot of our licenses in /usr/portage/licenses 
list specific copyright holders - of a single package, others have a 
different copyright line of course. Wouldn't this be copyright infringement, 
to distrbute a images based on Gentoo, but do not include the correct 
licenses!?

- There is at least one case we can't map right now. Think about the 
following: An ebuild licensed GPL, depends on another one, licensed CPL. Both 
licenses are incompatible. It's impossible to distinct (within our 
LICENSE="foo" stuff), if the CPL licensed tool is only used to generate 
something at compile time and also used but not linked to at runtime, to the 
case the GPL licensed application links to a library, the CPL licensed ebuils 
provides. Again, binary distributions building on Gentoo are lost.
The package I have in mind is media-gfx/graphviz in this case.


Carsten

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-02 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-01 12:44 [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-01 12:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Lars Weiler
2006-09-01  0:00   ` Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
2006-09-01 13:24   ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-01 13:45     ` Luis Medinas
2006-09-01 14:59       ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-05  3:38         ` Luis Medinas
2006-09-05  6:19           ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-05  6:57           ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-05 11:11           ` Lars Weiler
2006-09-05 12:20           ` Luca Barbato
2006-09-01 13:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-01  0:00   ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
2006-09-01 13:24     ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-01  0:00       ` Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
2006-09-01 13:36   ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
2006-09-01 14:31     ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-01 14:38       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-09-01 14:42       ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-09-01 15:57         ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-01 18:26 ` Greg KH
2006-09-01 19:18   ` Chris White
2006-09-01 19:46     ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-01 19:57       ` Chris White
2006-09-01 20:19         ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-01 20:20     ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-01 20:28       ` Chris White
2006-09-01 20:43         ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-01 20:54           ` Chris White
2006-09-01 21:47             ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-01 22:15               ` Chris White
2006-09-01 22:35                 ` Alec Warner
2006-09-01 20:31       ` Olivier Crete
2006-09-05 11:16         ` Lars Weiler
2006-09-01 20:19   ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-02 15:07   ` Carsten Lohrke [this message]
2006-09-02  1:13 ` Peter Gordon
2006-09-02  2:32   ` Greg KH
2006-09-02  3:10     ` Peter Gordon
2006-09-02  4:01     ` Alec Warner
2006-09-02  5:39       ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-05 11:19     ` Lars Weiler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200609021707.14077.carlo@gentoo.org \
    --to=carlo@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox