From: Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:07:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200609021707.14077.carlo@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060901182608.GB9973@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1921 bytes --]
On Friday 01 September 2006 20:26, Greg KH wrote:
> So we are just fine, one of the advantages of being a source-based
> distro :)
Um, rereading term three of the GPL, you're right of course. The question
remains how do we flag this. LICENSE="GPL-2 CDDL-Schily" in case of
cdrtools!? Yes, the latter is the license file we have in the tree and
looking at it, the only difference to the CDDL is that it includes an
additional notice, which sets the court to Berlin, Germany.
Also we need to have a file that lists clashing licenses, so Portage (at least
in a future, caring about licenses) will trow warnings, when binary packages
get build. I mean we claim to be a meta-distribution, but I don't think
projects basing their binary distributions on Gentoo can feel safe a bit with
regards to lisensing. We do absolutely nothing to care for that right now.
While thinking about it, other issues came to my mind:
- Ciaran pushed for not installing license/copyright information
in /usr/share/doc/${PF}. But a lot of our licenses in /usr/portage/licenses
list specific copyright holders - of a single package, others have a
different copyright line of course. Wouldn't this be copyright infringement,
to distrbute a images based on Gentoo, but do not include the correct
licenses!?
- There is at least one case we can't map right now. Think about the
following: An ebuild licensed GPL, depends on another one, licensed CPL. Both
licenses are incompatible. It's impossible to distinct (within our
LICENSE="foo" stuff), if the CPL licensed tool is only used to generate
something at compile time and also used but not linked to at runtime, to the
case the GPL licensed application links to a library, the CPL licensed ebuils
provides. Again, binary distributions building on Gentoo are lost.
The package I have in mind is media-gfx/graphviz in this case.
Carsten
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-02 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-01 12:44 [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-01 12:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Lars Weiler
2006-09-01 0:00 ` Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
2006-09-01 13:24 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-01 13:45 ` Luis Medinas
2006-09-01 14:59 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-09-05 3:38 ` Luis Medinas
2006-09-05 6:19 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-05 6:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-05 11:11 ` Lars Weiler
2006-09-05 12:20 ` Luca Barbato
2006-09-01 13:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-01 0:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
2006-09-01 13:24 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-01 0:00 ` Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
2006-09-01 13:36 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
2006-09-01 14:31 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-01 14:38 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-09-01 14:42 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-09-01 15:57 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-09-01 18:26 ` Greg KH
2006-09-01 19:18 ` Chris White
2006-09-01 19:46 ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-01 19:57 ` Chris White
2006-09-01 20:19 ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-01 20:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-01 20:28 ` Chris White
2006-09-01 20:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-01 20:54 ` Chris White
2006-09-01 21:47 ` Jakub Moc
2006-09-01 22:15 ` Chris White
2006-09-01 22:35 ` Alec Warner
2006-09-01 20:31 ` Olivier Crete
2006-09-05 11:16 ` Lars Weiler
2006-09-01 20:19 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-02 15:07 ` Carsten Lohrke [this message]
2006-09-02 1:13 ` Peter Gordon
2006-09-02 2:32 ` Greg KH
2006-09-02 3:10 ` Peter Gordon
2006-09-02 4:01 ` Alec Warner
2006-09-02 5:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2006-09-05 11:19 ` Lars Weiler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200609021707.14077.carlo@gentoo.org \
--to=carlo@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox