From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJBTm-0004Cu-7E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:02:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k81G15pC012812; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:01:05 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k81FvggZ028485 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:57:42 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x30so695745nfb for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:57:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=F1/FBd0aXBJgt+9hBzcX6g/AWwOKvFo+Dlr2bHBH1DHOe1djxt/Kqq5x4l52lZ3WGkfbalCnPD0ABe0WNHPAr7LH1qMWkDFO27jvyMyFuHaL7RUIG9E1i3d2pIb7aE0g62N5Sv6H9iRt+lvonB0F858sCl3zT/5YHKvxTznO5jY= Received: by 10.48.230.18 with SMTP id c18mr3155130nfh; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:57:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.69.110]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 24sm1446117huf.2006.09.01.08.57.40; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:57:41 -0700 (PDT) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:57:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200609011444.59711.carlo@gentoo.org> <200609011631.56257@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200609011642.07352.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200609011642.07352.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2742739.8TN6MKN7R1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200609011757.38410@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 66d763bf-38bb-441d-bd9b-66f46457acb0 X-Archives-Hash: 31ed59c61f8ed05537a4960c41d4b6b5 --nextPart2742739.8TN6MKN7R1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 01 September 2006 16:42, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > Actually the GPL specifically states that build scripts are part of the > source code explicitly. And requires you to make it available, but it doesn't strictly require its= =20 license terms to be the same. Maybe I'm confused a bit, but for what I can= =20 understasnd of the license, he _can_ license them under CDDL... but when we= =20 get them together with the source code, GPL still applies; which means CDDL= =20 applies only on the makefiles by themselves. I never said it made sense,=20 understand me, but it doesn't actually create a GPL violation, as we still= =20 get them as GPL'd software. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart2742739.8TN6MKN7R1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBE+Fhye2h1+2mHVWMRApaIAKCr9hgM6TC1VH2DmDmzA9WrUYeMgQCfTZub cLWJyBHFf2hcNbeVLuT0a0Q= =FumR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2742739.8TN6MKN7R1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list