From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GIpdM-0007Zj-NS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:43:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7VGevOp028318; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:40:57 GMT Received: from HOUMAIL003.corp.halliburton.com (houmail003.halliburton.com [34.254.16.15]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7VGbfr3012040 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:37:42 GMT Received: from HOUEXGR003.corp.halliburton.com (houexgr003.corp.halliburton.com [34.224.32.249]) by HOUMAIL003.corp.halliburton.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7VGUWEu003230 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:39:04 -0500 Received: from HOUEXCH079.corp.halliburton.com ([34.224.34.119]) by HOUEXGR003.corp.halliburton.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:36:38 -0500 Received: from localhost ([34.224.38.205]) by HOUEXCH079.corp.halliburton.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:36:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:34:25 -0500 From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: Globalness of some USE flags Message-ID: <20060831163424.GG27520@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <44f6f1150af5b@wp.pl> <200608310729.17172.chriswhite@gentoo.org> <44F6F765.7080704@gentoo.org> <44F6F90C.7060506@gentoo.org> <20060831163721.5692fd91@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="76DTJ5CE0DCVQemd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060831163721.5692fd91@snowdrop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2006 16:36:38.0144 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1596800:01C6CD1B] X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=0 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-0608080000 definitions=main-0608310002 X-Archives-Salt: 058e1fba-bd07-46fe-bb40-9a421c42b297 X-Archives-Hash: 1ceac83b0a8a1c4d1bc94bd005043b14 --76DTJ5CE0DCVQemd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Thu Aug 31 2006, 10:37:21AM CDT] > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:58:20 +0200 Simon Stelling > wrote: > | I think we agreed at least 3 times on that the logrotate use flag > | shouldn't exist at all because those files add <4kb to the package. >=20 > No we didn't. It's another file in /etc, which is entirely different > from another file not in /etc. My recollection was that the argument against having a logrotate USE flag that meant "please install a logrotate script" was that it was unnecessary since the user could just mask out /etc/logrotate.d instead (using INSTALL_MASK) if those scripts weren't desired. -g2boojum- --=20 Grant Goodyear=09 Gentoo Developer g2boojum@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 --76DTJ5CE0DCVQemd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE9w+QptxxUuD2W3YRAsMIAJ9zls3HoPvaoRPGPkWx/EmTtx/dPACfRcYU xL7ntBU8YaMQKAWfcz8ee68= =/gJm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --76DTJ5CE0DCVQemd-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list