From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GIRGm-0002RS-Un for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:42:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7UEfXYp000594; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:41:33 GMT Received: from mailrelay2.tugraz.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7UEdj59019507 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:39:45 GMT Received: from superlupo (fanachpc62.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.185.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay2.tugraz.at (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k7UEddfY022772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:39:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by superlupo (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2F9D087B09; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:36:43 +0200 From: Wernfried Haas To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance Message-ID: <20060830143643.GA16809@superlupo> References: <44F58401.1030104@gentoo.org> <200608301554.14216.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <44F59370.8040303@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44F59370.8040303@gentoo.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 129.27.10.19 X-Archives-Salt: 4604196c-c707-4b77-82d0-5a2bb39888d2 X-Archives-Hash: 19b8a54a38dc461c1875e93da0771a97 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:32:32AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > The only problem is that it lists him as contactable by > "nickname@gentoo.org" aka ciaran@gentoo.org which is false. Also the whole section is called "Developers", not "people who once contributed but aren't developers any more or eventually they are, well you never know for sure, just send an email and see if it bounces". ;-) > I've actually wondered about this as well since I've been in projects as > a non-dev and Treecleaners has non-devs. Can we get some kind of > modification to the tag for non-gentoo contributors? http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/ Looks like a perfect example how to solve it to me - one section listing the developers and one for contributors who aren't. cheers, Wernfried --=20 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE9aJ7K/GNBBblp4ARAu4FAJ4+cfbLij1eitW8lD7GtC7qQ/lVEACeMzVl V82iPy18O7trPMwsTCj8fKk= =6r+A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list