From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GGvJE-0000xW-1s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:22:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7QALmus028774; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:21:48 GMT Received: from mailrelay1.tu-graz.ac.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7QAJwkG005977 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:19:58 GMT Received: from superlupo.rechner (M2582P000.adsl.highway.telekom.at [212.183.54.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay1.tu-graz.ac.at (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7QAJr6k022200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:19:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by superlupo.rechner (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 35F078790E; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:17:03 +0200 From: Wernfried Haas To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet Message-ID: <20060826101703.GA32678@superlupo.rechner> References: <44ECF00D.7050107@gentoo.org> <20060824145416.13761551@snowdrop.home> <1156458543.19720.57.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060825171359.GB15870@superlupo.rechner> <1156530953.8585.56.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1156530953.8585.56.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 129.27.10.18 X-Archives-Salt: 704c0626-0772-41b0-aa63-29374fca802c X-Archives-Hash: 799e37ef35c65baf309d95bc760db6ad --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 02:35:53PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > Btw, the new policy also includes the possibility of refering a > > decision to the council in certain cases, see "Resolution and Appeal". >=20 > I've read the policy. Did i say you didn't? > > > I'm sure nearly every member > > > of devrel would agree that they would love to see a Gentoo where devr= el > > > simply wasn't needed. > >=20 > > I assume you're only refering to conflict resolution again, and i > > agree it would be great. I just don't think this is ever going to > > happen as long there are more than 50 developers. >=20 > Quit assuming I mean anything, you're batting zero for two right now. What's the problem? I wasn't sure how you meant it, so i assumed you meant it that way. As for batting zero for two, i never heard that phrase before and have nfc what it means, but somehow that whole statement doesn't seem very friendly to me. > Luckily, I wasn't asking if you thought it was possible. I've merely > been stating that it should be possible. Perhaps i'm misreading this comment too, but i'm taking that one personal. Screw you guys i'm going home. Let's not waste any more bandwidth and time on it. cheers, Wernfried =20 --=20 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE8B+eK/GNBBblp4ARAt7qAJ9jPNnz2HAbpS6B4VMOyjhpWmWRwQCeNmiW TJmUGoxCnEF+nnPiOaKlBho= =D0PX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list