From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GGJZ2-0004Uv-S2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:04:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7OI2fui014705; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:02:41 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7OHwRgb025355 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:58:27 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B658864714 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02376-03 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE9F64595 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.83.36.144] (helo=sven.genone.homeip.net) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1GGJTB1P3A-0002MY; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:58:21 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:01:02 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet Message-ID: <20060824200102.1dd2f54d@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <44EDD98C.2040909@gentoo.org> References: <44ECF00D.7050107@gentoo.org> <44EDACD8.6060900@gentoo.org> <20060824145628.5bad7e89@snowdrop.home> <44EDB3A8.5000305@gentoo.org> <20060824153221.549704c8@snowdrop.home> <44EDBE7E.4040503@gentoo.org> <44EDD98C.2040909@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_VTfF3pSsn70.lOCoFd/00VC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.356 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.356 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 7125ef48-f35d-49d0-90b1-87038d80030d X-Archives-Hash: 12ff1e0270e7ba2b6a1d1c946ca76e8c --Sig_VTfF3pSsn70.lOCoFd/00VC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:53:32 -0400 Luis Francisco Araujo wrote: > Lance Albertson wrote: > >=20 > > I thought of that while I was walking to a meeting..heh Basically, > > Appoint two people to co-lead, or appoint one Lead and one Vice > > Lead. That way there's some kind of accountability on the bare > > minimum level and good coverage (hopefully). > >=20 >=20 > I was also thinking about turning the Council into a Leaders Group , > or probably to create a new Core Team. [snip] Before everyone start posting "solutions" please *clearly* define the perceived problem first, otherwise all attempts to fix it are futile. Marius PS: is it really already time again for the annual Gentoo restructuring debate? --=20 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. --Sig_VTfF3pSsn70.lOCoFd/00VC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE7eliWzrL1pM7SNcRAqdqAJ4uT+YytxD0JrfoA67PcQKnCaA4CQCfRmx+ gEaac/hSgvXkftvy8hJlvKI= =SB7r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_VTfF3pSsn70.lOCoFd/00VC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list