From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GGAdP-0001Pb-Ne for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:32:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7O8VVbW017209; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:31:31 GMT Received: from mailrelay2.tu-graz.ac.at (mailrelay.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.2.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7O8Swsm016699 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:28:58 GMT Received: from superlupo (fanachpc62.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.185.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailrelay2.tu-graz.ac.at (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7O8Sojj023343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:28:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by superlupo.rechner (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0719587B43; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:26:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:26:04 +0200 From: Wernfried Haas To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet Message-ID: <20060824082604.GA7747@superlupo> References: <44ECF00D.7050107@gentoo.org> <20060824065019.GA13655@superlupo.rechner> <44ED5B2F.8010605@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44ED5B2F.8010605@gentoo.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 129.27.10.19 X-Archives-Salt: 3a08b045-f8d2-443f-a157-935157df3626 X-Archives-Hash: 5554ba86d8e8d4cab969c1d278f0de86 --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:54:23AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > The council doesn't actually do anything AFAICT, it just "approves" GLEP > decisions that have already been made. So in effect we have no leadership. Suspending sunrise was a decision, as was unsuspending it. However i agree that currently their main role is approving GLEPs and other decisions which makes them official Gentoo decisions. If that's a good or bad thing (tm) depends on the POV, i mainly think it's good to have it like that and no leader whatsoever. cheers, Wernfried --=20 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE7WKcK/GNBBblp4ARAmmSAJ4z3hjLhe1P2Xv63D1Q4FMns6sjTACfaH7O ZO2QZpMpg7IS+VtoWsjcjIk= =VqVz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list