Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-Status

[Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1480 bytes --]

On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400
Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:

> It has been noted that certain projects do not communicate their
> activities well.
> 
> Many projects provide documentation for things(java), provide status
> updates on things(ppc), have bits in the gwn (x86,userrel,amd64),
> Release releases (releng), or have active webpages (adopt-a-dev,
> bugday)
> 
> There are some projects that keep to themselves; AND these projects
> concern other projects (are global, to an extent).  This AND means I
> can leave out things like arch teams, or smaller projects that don't
> update often.  This mail is not meant for things like that.  So below
> we have 3 large far-reaching projects.
> 
> Gentoo Quality Assurance Team
> Gentoo Infrastructure Team
> Gentoo Portage Team
> Gentoo Foundation
> Gentoo Council
> 
> All 5 of these projects are active.  However all 5 have failed to
> communicate what they are doing; leading to people asking multiple
> times about an issue, people getting frustrated, people getting
> outright pissed off and hostile.  Today especially has been a bad day
> for this.

If this really concerns you then I have to ask why *you* didn't send
status reports for the Portage Team in the past?

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]