From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GFGQV-0000dU-4M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:31:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7LKUDB1001096; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:30:13 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7LKSNH7019624 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:28:23 GMT Received: from home.wh0rd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C25F6479D for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20903 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2006 15:07:02 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2006 15:07:02 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] mulltiib cruft: /emul Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:08:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200608081143.13375.vapier@gentoo.org> <200608211328.37602.vapier@gentoo.org> <1156181980.2497.3.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> In-Reply-To: <1156181980.2497.3.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1308212.t44T5qP1nx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608211508.17122.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 84c0bfbc-f76e-4e98-8162-df514210063e X-Archives-Hash: f710dfd40a0de810f4bf7057c0ac775d --nextPart1308212.t44T5qP1nx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 August 2006 13:39, Olivier Crete wrote: > Will we make emul-x86-gtk-libs block gtk+? We dont have use based > deps/blockers... building for ABI is unrelated to USE flags > how long will it take before we have API/arch based=20 > ones. you really think having users build ABI stuff on the fly is due to come out= =20 soon ? > In my humble opinion, keeping that stuff in emul is much better,=20 > in the same way as we would install binary packages in /opt and > not /usr. then you have mixed packages installed ... when you build a 32bit app again= st=20 GTK+, which version is going to be used at link time ? /emul ? /lib32 ? = =20 how about at run time ? =2Dmike --nextPart1308212.t44T5qP1nx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAROoEoUFjO5/oN/WBAQLBlA//VMQzFvCf3Ou0/4/GoBqpxPiYe8IYxsBJ CDYwFU8ptxM8A5aEQnSy0kvJvqzyjC2rYQyO0IYuevxHexQug4e1HJxqMhEa20rZ /jVwZyVp56QNPjXoNPj01EfsqQCQqF81wYPaZHPnsqki16fT1/huET+6/+fDomtQ KVFlO34bxcuR4PMCHF7BPjMTGSfCePEnS4Jlm0+0nss34f0FNfsHC1NAjpgrZ69q J1nf0tJPZMaaL+DbyLVwC5dUJ+sGrBt3kfbcmL8zgmzvFymGo0j2KdH9rAvvoAxb DTV/GQeMB9pI5cVq8A4CEYPDEgeAJzGuHJvO0n2hYlC6mcpxo7Etyy4y4PqDwPnq efzwIjAYMCyUgDBelZExw4OfiD9Z6Ur6nACX/OuiyDc5N0rid4FBo4r1jqWoNBlM OcNC+hHCLCL0qXgy87dXHyN1qdNft+wLQHhTk8EmuLyMXsLkeLNC1mIuAwfVHKWi U/i+u/TAysEW45pWhqaIpXZ3fdGFwJgdrTeMtFP+2Qx6jSl/wwtJ3RxCMNFOc8AT P3NxdKhf1Yy/8zpg/QqANZN5uQytETC3ui1VWjHLGhdonzplCv6ghY+i8QioWUVy 6zqzHotessG5SJYQDzCm0RixTCMbtP7rU2FNLTmsroSnoj0FTOztMrpX/I2deJjl ocnjr2xd2gI= =bTms -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1308212.t44T5qP1nx-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list